Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20030808Decision Memo.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:CO MMISSI 0 NER KJELLAND ER COMMISSIONER SMITH CO MMISSI 0 NER HANSEN JEAN JEWELL COMMISSION STAFF LEGAL WORKING FILE FROM:DOUG COOLEY DATE:AUGUST 6, 2003 RE:APPLICATIONS FOR BROADBAND EQUIPMENT TAX CREDIT CASE NO. PRJ- T -03-01. BACKGROUND On July 16, 2003, the Commission received an Application from Project Mutual Telephone Cooperative Association, Inc. to receive an investment tax credit for eligible broadband equipment pursuant to Order No. 28784 and Idaho Code ~ 63-30291(4). To be eligible for the tax credit, the taxpayer must obtain from the Commission an Order confirming that installed equipment qualifies for the tax credit. DISCUSSION Project Mutual stated that, during calendar year 2002, it installed various components as part of its wireline and wireless broadband network for the provision of high-speed Internet access to customers in Cassia and Minidoka counties. The companies also indicated that high- speed access to customers began in 2001 at transmission rates from 256 kilobits per second (kbps) up to 1.54 megabits per second (Mbps). In 2002, Project Mutual indicates that it installed fiber optic cable, fiber optic transceivers and multiplexers, and Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) moderns with supporting line cards, ports and cables. Project Mutual also installed wireless moderns, antennae, optical laser multiplexers and an ATM switch in providing ADSL and HDSL broadband service to customers in Minidoka and Cassia counties. Project Mutual also capitalized the labor and overhead costs associated with the installation of this equipment DECISION MEMORANDUM AUGUST 6, 2003 STAFF REVIEW Staff has reviewed the list of proposed broadband equipment submitted by the companies and believes the equipment is "necessary to the provision of broadband services and an integral part of a broadband network" according to Idaho Code ~ 63-30291 (3)(b)(i). Staffhas had discussions with Project Mutual to clarify the nature of various pieces of equipment and has also been assured that the installation labor, overhead, and supporting equipment is directly related to offering broadband in Idaho. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Application from Project Mutual and further recommends that the Commission forward the approving Order and copies of the Applications to the Idaho Tax Commission. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to confirm that the equipment in the Application qualifies as broadband equipment and forward the Applications to the Tax Commission? DOll Coole udmemos/project mutual 2002 DECISION MEMORANDUM AUGUST 6, 2003