Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170320final_order_no_33728.pdfOffice of the Secretary Service Date March 20.2017 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE LETTER ) REQUEST OF QWEST CORPORATION DBA )CASE NO.PAP-T-14-Ol CENTURYLINK QC TO DISCO1TINUE ) FILING THE IDAHO PERFORMANCE )ORDER NO.33728 ASSURANCE PLAN REPORTS ) On November 10,2016,Qwest Corporation dba CenturyLink QC (the Company) filed a letter asking that the Commission permit the Company to stop submitting the Qwest Performance Assurance Plan (QPAP)reports that the Company has been submitting each month under Commission Order No.32899.Case No.QWE-T-08-04. BACKGROUND Section 271 of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 established procedures for the Company to obtain authorization from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to provide in-region interLATA’and interstate telecommunications services..47 U.S.C.§271. In particular,Section 271 (c)(2)(B)contained a “competitive checklist”that generally provided that the Company provide access and interconnection to competitors.Before allowing the Company to offer telecommunications services in its region,the FCC was also required to find that allowing the Company to compete in its region against competitors “is consistent with the public interest,convenience and necessity.”47 U.S.C.§271(d)(3)(C).To ensure continued compliance with the competitive checklist,the FCC determined that the Company should develop and implement a “Performance Assurance Plan”(PAP).As this Commission noted in February 2003,“[the Companyj’s PAP provides specific standards for the Company’s delivery of services to competitor telecommunications providers and automatic penalties if the standards are not met.”Notice of Modified Procedure,Case No.USW-T-00-03.2 ‘A LATA (local access and transport area)is a geographic area designed by the United States District Court in the Modification of Final Judgment in the divestiture of AT&T and the Bell Operating Companies (BOCs).The LATAs were created to facilitate the division of assets between AT&T and the BOCs,and to mark the boundaries within which the BOCs could transport calls.As approved by the Court,all of the Qwest local exchanges south of the Salmon River are included in a single LATA,called the Idaho LATA.The eight local exchanges served by Qwest (formerly Pacific Northwest Bell)in northern Idaho are included in the Spokane LATA.The Coeur d’Alene market area exchanges served by Verizon Northwest (now Frontier Communications Northwest)are not associated with either the Spokane or Idaho LATA. 2 The Commission approved a revised QPAP in Order No.32899,Case No.QWE-T-l 3-05. ORDER NO.33728 1 The QPAP was intended to provide economic incentives (i.e.,penalties)to encourage the Company to provide non-discriminatory service to competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs).Order No.32106 at 1.In the event the Company failed to meet the performance standards in its QPAP,the Company would have to make remedial payments to either the affected CLEC or to the State of Idaho fund established by the applicable state regulatory commission.These payments were divided into two self-executing types.First,Tier 1 payments were made to a particular CLEC if the Company did not meet the service standards when providing service or access to that CLEC.QPAP §2.1.Second,if the Company failed to meet certain other service standards that did not directly impact a particular CLEC,the Company was required to make Tier 2 payments to two accounts established by state commissions.QPAP § 2.1.1;Order No.30461 at 3.Funds from the Tier 2 “special fund”account were used to defray audit and oversight expenses incurred by this Commission in reviewing Qwest’s Section 271 compliance.The Tier 2 “discretionary fund”account was comprised of remedial payments and intended to be used for “competitively neutral Idaho telecommunications initiatives.”QPAP § 11.3.4. In order for the Commission to track and monitor the QPAP performance standards and payments,the Commission ordered the Company to file monthly QPAP reports with the Commission.See Order No.32899,Case No.QWE-T-13-05.The Company has filed the monthly reports since April 2014. STAFF RECOMMENDATION After reviewing the Company’s letter,Staff filed a memorandum recommending that the Company discontinue filing monthly QPAP reports.However,Staff also recommended that the Company advise Staff in writing if the Company has to make a QPAP Tier 1 payment to a CLEC because the Company failed to satisfy a QPAP performance standard.Staff asked that the Company be required to report the nature of the missed performance standard,and the date and amount of the resulting payment. Staff noted that,in June 2016,after the Company had not been required to pay any Tier 2 penalties for a significant length of time,the Commission closed the Tier 2 payment account.See Commission Order No.33532,Case No.GNR-T-16-04.The Commission then allocated remaining Tier 2 monies to the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare’s Suicide ORDER NO.33728 2 Prevention Action Network,and to the E-9 11 emergency dispatch training and certification program at POST,both competitively neutral Idaho telecommunications initiatives. While the Company has continued to file monthly QPAP reports,which dealt with both Tier 1 and Tier 2 standards and penalties,Commission Staff and the Company have discussed whether the Company should continue to submit those reports now that the Commission has closed the Tier 2 payment account.As part of these discussions,Staff asked the Company to explain whether it had made any Tier 1 payments to CLECs in 2016.The Company explained that,in August of 2016,it paid a significant penalty to a CLEC after it failed to meet a performance standard. As the Commission has closed the Tier 2 account and the Company only paid one Tier 1 penalty in 2016,Staff recommended that the Commission close Case No.PAP-T-14-01 and no longer require the Company to submit monthly Tier 1 and Tier 2 payment reports. However,as Tier 1 payments still occasionally occur,Staff believes the Company should continue to alert the Commission to these payments when they occur.Staff thus recommended that the Commission direct the Company to report Tier 1 payments as they occur.Staff suggested that the report identify the penalty amount,when the penalty was paid,and what performance standard was not achieved.Staff believes this reporting requirement will continue to promote service performance parity from the Company,ensure that network elements are available to competitors,and promote competition for Idaho consumers. COMMISSION FINDINGS Based upon our review of this case,the Commission finds it reasonable and appropriate to approve CenturyLink’s request to discontinue the filing of its Performance Assurance Plan reports.However,as Tier 1 payments may still occur,CenturyLink shall report these Tier 1 payments to the Commission within 30 days of occurrence.The report will identify the penalty amount,when the penalty was paid,and what performance standard was missed.The Commission further finds that any reports shall continue to be provided to the Commission,with reference to Case No.PAP-T-14-01,and notice to Commission Staff. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Qwest Corporation dba CenturyLink QC’s request to discontinue the filing of its Performance Assurance Plan is approved,and Case No.PAP-T 14-0 1 is hereby closed. ORDER NO.33728 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that CenturyLink shall continue to report Tier 1 payments as they occur according to the terms of this Order. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER.Any person interested in this Order may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21)days of the service date of this Order.Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration,any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration.See Idaho Code §61-626,62-619. DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise,Idaho this day of March 2017. ATTEST: Diane M.Hanian Commission Secretary O:PAP-T-14-Olsc KRI INE RAPER,C MMISSIONERzz ERIC ANDERSON,COMMISSIONER PAUL KJEL.PRESIDENT ORDER NO.33728 4