GTE987.docx

WELDON B. STUTZMAN
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
472 WEST WASHINGTON STREET
PO BOX 83720
BOISE, IDAHO  83720-0074
[phone]
Street Address for Express Mail:
472 W WASHINGTON
BOISE ID  83702-5983
Attorney for the Commission Staff
BEFORE  THE  IDAHO  PUBLIC  UTILITIES  COMMISSION

IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION)
OF NEXTEL WEST CORPORATION AND GTE) CASE  NO.  GTE-T-98-7
NORTHWEST, INC. FOR APPROVAL OF AN )
AGREEMENT FORINTERCONNECTION )COMMENTS OF THE
PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C. § 252(e).)COMMISSION STAFF
)
_______________________________________________)
COMES  NOW  the Staff of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, by and through its Attorney of record, Weldon B. Stutzman, Deputy Attorney General, and submits the following comments for the Commission’s consideration in Case No. GTE-T-98-7.
On December 7, 1998, GTE Northwest Inc. (GTE) and Nextel West Corporation (Nextel), a wireless telecommunications service provider, submitted a Joint Application for approval of an interconnection agreement in accordance with Section 252(e) of the Federal Telecommunications Act.  The Companies indicated the Agreement had been reached through voluntary negotiations, and claimed the Agreement is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity.  They requested the Commission approve the Agreement without a hearing or intervention by other parties.
Section 252 indicates that such agreements are to be submitted to state commissions for approval.  Agreements adopted through negotiation may only be rejected if the state commission finds that:
(i) the agreement (or portion thereof) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or
(ii) the implementation of such agreement or portion is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity:
STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff reviewed the language of this Agreement and found the terms and conditions to be similar to the terms contained in two previous agreements between GTE and wireless telecommunications providers previously approved by this Commission.  
Staff concludes that the terms or conditions in this Agreement are not discriminatory.   Staff concurs with the Companies’ claim that the Agreement is consistent with the pro-competitive policies of the Commission, the Idaho Legislature, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and therefore is consistent with the public interest.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Commission approve this Interconnection Agreement as filed.
DATED  at Boise, Idaho, this            day of February 4, 1999.____________________________
Weldon B. Stutzman
Deputy Attorney General
Technical Staff:  Wayne Hart
wh:ws/gtet987.wsw/umisc/cmts