20150814Comments (3 Total).pdf

Jean Jewell
From:[e-mail]
Sent:Wednesday,August 12,2015 12:41 PM
To:Beverly Barker;Jean Jewell;Gene Fadness
Cc:[e-mail]
Subject:Case Comment Form:Paul Roberts
Name:Paul Roberts
Case Number:GNR-T-15-06
Email:k1dpryahoo.corn
Telephone:20$680-4210
Address:6260 Los Bancos Dr.
El Paso TX,79912
Name of Utility Company:Verizon
Acknowledge public record:True
Comment:After living all over the world courtesy of the Navy,I spent 30 years in Idaho.
recently moved to El Paso to be nearer to grandkids and escape the harsh SE Idaho winters.
Taking my 208 cell phone with me,it allows my many Idaho friends to keep in touch without
jumping through numerous hoops.In my opinion,the geographical OVERLAY makes more sense to
me if possible.If not,I would recommend dividing the state along the time zone boundary
and those in Pacific Time get the new area code.
Unique Identifier:70.120.179.72
1
Jean Jewell
From:novapeterson @yahoo.com
Sent:Thursday,August 13,2015 11:47 PM
To:Beverly Barker;Jean Jewell;Gene Fadness
Cc:[e-mail]
Subject:Case Comment Form:Nova McClurg
Name:Nova McClurg
Case Number:GNR-T-15-06
Email:novapeterson(yahoo.corn
Telephone:
Address:4185 Birchwood Cir.
Ammon ID,83406
Name of Utility Company:Century Link
Acknowledge public record:True
Comment:I am opposed to a geographic overlay of area codes and instead support a split.
I moved from Utah a year ago.The first time Utah adopted a new area code they did a split,
but the second time they implemented an overlay.I found the overlay to be frustrating.
There’s a reason phone numbers have seven digits--it’s easier for people to remember and
process.It was difficult trying to teach my young children our 10-digit phone number for
them to remember.I would much rather have to change my phone number than have to remember
and then hand-dial 10 numbers every single time I make a call.
States have been adding area codes through splits for ages and it doesn’t seem to have been a
problem.People generally have had to change their numbers anytime they moved so this would
be nothing new.And I believe all those with cell phones get to keep their numbers anyway.
Please,do a split and keep this easier for us.An initial change is much more palatable
than an endless hassle.
Unique Identifier:70.56.201.27
1
Jean Jewell
From:[e-mail]
Sent:Friday,August 14,2015 11:23 AM
To:Beverly Barker;Jean Jewell;Gene Fadness
Cc:[e-mail]
Subject:Case Comment Form:Alex Claunts
Name:Alex Claunts
Case Number:GNR-T-15-06
Email:aclaunts(gmail.com
Telephone:[phone]
Address:6450 N Mineral Drive
Coeur U Alene Idaho,83815
Name of Utility Company:Verizon
Acknowledge public record:True
Comment:I support the geographic split for new numbers.
I assume that North Idaho will get the new numbers due to the southern part of the state
being more populated.So as a resident I recommend the geographic split.Idaho County and
north would make the most sense.
Unique Identifier:149.101.1.118
1