HomeMy WebLinkAbout20070427Motion for a staff investigation.pdfGIVE SLEY LLP
LAW OFFICES
601 W. Bannock Street
PO Box 2720, Boise, Idaho 83701
TELEPHONE: 208 388-1200
FACSIMILE: 208 388-1300
WEBSITE: www.givenspursley.com
Gary G. Allen
Kelly T. Barbour
Peter G. Barton
Christopher J. Beeson
Wiliiam C. Coie
Michael C. Creamer
Thomas E. Dvorak
Roy Lewis Eiguren
Jeffrey C. Fereday
Martin C. Hendrickson
Steven J. Hippier
Debora K. Kristensen
Anne C. Kunkel
Jeremy G. Ladle
Michaei P. Lawrence
Franklin G. Lee
David R. Lombardi
John M. Marshali
Kenneth R. McClure
Kelly Greene McConnell
Cynthia A. Meiillo
Christopher H. Meyer
L Edward Milier
Patrick J. Miller
Judson B. Montgomery
Angela K. Neison
Deborah E. Nelson
W. Hugh O'Riordan, LLM.
Angeia M. Reed
Scott A. Tschirgi, LLM.
J. Will Varin
Conley E. Ward
Robert B. White
Terri R. Yost
Via Hand Deliverv
RETIRED
Kenneth L Pursley
Raymond D. Givens
James A. McClure
April 27, 2007
Licensed in New York
and Washington DC
Ms. Xan Allen
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 W. Washington
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
, --..
0;;::0
: "( :.,.., .-...::"' ;:..
Re:Edge Wireless Application for ETC Documentation
IPUC Case No. EDG-07-
_c-.
, ..
Dear Xan:
I write to confirm that on April 25 2007 the Idaho Telephone Association ("ITA") filed
the original and seven copies of Idaho Telephone Association s Motionfor a Staff Investigation
in the above referenced matter. Page four of the Motion and Exhibits Band C have been
redacted in the original and four of copies. The remaining three copies contain information
designated by Edge Wireless as "highly confidential" that is subject to the terms of a Protective
Agreement entered into between counsel for IT A and counsel for Edge Wireless.
j/f
Michael C. Creamer
cc:Service List
M CC : kdt S:\CLIENfS\1233\198\MCC Ltr to puc re Redacted Information.DOC
Conley E. Ward (ISB No. 1683)
Michael C. Creamer (ISB No. 4030)
GIVENS PURSLEY LLP
601 W. Bannock Street
O. Box 2720
Boise, ID 83701-2720
Telephone No. (208) 388-1200
Fax No. (208) 388-1300
cew~givenspursley .com
mcc~givenspursley. com
iDOl ;\?5 :'( 38
It " i-: i
)1 lLl'II~:.
~(;
J'~8;;
Attorneys for Idaho Telephone Association
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF
EDGE WIRELESS, LLC FOR
DESIGNATION AS AN ELIGIBLE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER
UNDER 47 U.C. 9214(e)(2)
Case No. EDG-07-
IDAHO TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION'
MOTION FOR A STAFF
INVESTIGATION
The Idaho Telephone Association ("IT A"), by and through its attorneys Givens Pursley
LLP, files this Motion for a Staff Investigation as more particularly described herein.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On January 22, 2007, Edge Wireless, LLC ("Edge" or Applicant) filed with the Idaho
Public Utilities Commission ("Commission ) an Application for Designation as an Eligible
Telecommunications Carrier. Edge s application requests an eligible telecommunications carrier
ETC") designation for its wireless telecommunications service within the service areas of the
following incumbent local exchange carriers ("ILECs
):
Qwest Corporation ("Qwest"
CenturyTel ofIdaho ("Century ), Albion Telephone Company ("Albion ), Custer Telephone
Cooperative, Inc. ("Custer ), Direct Communications-Rockland ("Direct Communications
IDAHO TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR A STAFF INVESTIGATION - Page 1 of7
S:\clients\123J\198\ITA Motion for Staff Investigation.DOC
Filer Mutual Telephone Company ("Filer ), Fremont Telecom ("Fremont"), Mud Lake
Telephone Cooperative Association ("Mud Lake ), Project Mutual Telephone Cooperative
Association ("Project Mutual"), and Silver Star Telephone Company ("Silver Star ). All of these
ILECs except Qwest are "rural telephone companies" as that term is defined in 47 US.C. 9
153(37).
In Order No. 30240, the Commission issued its Notice of Application and Notice of
Modified Procedure in this matter. The Idaho Telephone Association! intervened and filed its
Protest and Comments on March 13 2007. The Commission thereafter provided an additional
28 days for further discovery, and directed the parties to then report whether hearings were
desired. For the reasons stated below, the ITA does not at this time request hearings, but it
respectfully requests that the Commission direct its Staff to conduct further investigations and
issue a report to the Commission and Parties for the reasons described below.
ARGUMENT
An applicant for ETC status within the service territory of a rural telephone company
must satisfy a two part test. At the outset, the applicant must demonstrate the ability to provide
supported services throughout the area for which the designation is sought. Section 214( e)(1) of
the Telecommunications Act of 1996 states that an applicant for ETC status:
shall, throughout the service area for which such designation is received-
(A) offer the services that are supported by Federal universal support mechanisms
under section 254 . . . ; and
(B) advertise the availability of such services and the charges therefore using
media of general distribution.
1 The ITA is authorized to represent member companies in regulatory proceedings and in other public
policy matters. ITA member companies include: Albion Telephone Company, Cambridge Telephone Company,
Custer Telephone Cooperative, Inc., Farmers Mutual Telephone Company, Filer Mutual Telephone Company,
Inland Telephone Company, Midvale Telephone Company, Mud Lake Telephone Cooperative Association, Project
Mutual Telephone Cooperative Association, Direct Communications - Rockland, Rural Telephone Company, Silver
Star Telephone Company, Oregon-Idaho Utilities, and Fremont Telecom.
IDAHO TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR A STAFF INVESTIGATION - Page 2 of 7
S:\clients\I233\198\IT A Motion for StaffInvestigation.DOC
47 US.C. 9214(e)(1). Section 214(e)(5) further provides:
In the case of an area served by a rural telephone company "service area
means such company s "study area" unless and until the Commission and the
States after taking into account recommendations of a Federal-State Joint Board
instituted under section 41 O( c), establish a different definition of service area for
such company.
Section 54.101 of the Code of Federal Regulations essentially repeats this statutory language.
In addition, an applicant for ETC status in a rural telephone company service area
must demonstrate to the Commission, and the Commission must find, that an additional
ETC designation "is in the public interest." 47 US.C. S 214(e)(2). In its Order No.
29841 , this Commission adopted, with minor modifications the public interest standards
promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"In the Matter of
Federal-State Joint Board On Universal Service CC Docket 96-45 (March 17 , 2005).
The initial difficulty with Edge s Application is that it cannot possibly meet the
first part of this test in all the service areas for which it is seeking an ETC designation. In
its Application at page 3 , Edge states "Edge serves all the wire centers in all of the rural
study areas listed in Exhibit C." This is manifestly false.
Because Edge has designated virtually all of the substantive information about its
network as proprietary and confidential, ITA counsel's discussion of Edge s network
with ITA members has been quite limited. However, when shown Edge s statement cited
above, several members reported that it could not possibly be true because Edge has no
facilities at all in one or more of their wire centers. As an example, the IT A has attached
to this pleading as Exhibit A, the Affidavit of Dennis Thornock, who states that Edge has
no facilities of any kind in any of Custer s wire centers.Furthermore, as Mr. Thornock'
IDAHO TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR A STAFF INVESTIGATION - Page 3 of 7
S:\clients\1233\198\ITA Motion for Staff Investigation.DOC
Affidavit points out, thorough coverCige of Custer s service area would require numerous
cell sites and other facilities.
The ITA members' reports appear to be confmned by Edge s Confidential, Exhibit
(attached for convenience as Exhibit B), which shows:
? .
' Based on this
i11forkation~aI1d a ~eview of Ed~e' s coverag~: maps ' the ITA believes that Edge:
... ... ,.... .
Furthermore, Edge s two year build-out plan (Exhibit D- 2, attached for convenience as
Exhibit B), does not
In addition to those wire centers where Edge does not provide any service, a
review of Edge s coverage map, attached as Exhibit C, suggests to ITA counsel that there
are
Presumably, these are the least dense and highest cost segments of those we centers. In
these wire centers, Edge s Application is, in effect, a request fpr ETC designation in a
partial wire center. This Commission has previously rejected such applications, on the
IDAHO TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR A STAFF lJ.~VESTIGATION - F'age 4 of7S:\clienla\ 123:1\1 98\IT A Motion for StaffInvestigation.DOC
grounds that they raise concerns about "cream skimming.See Order No. 29541 at 16-
l8.
Rural cream skimming occurs when competitors seek to serve only the low-cost
high revenue customers in a rural telephone company s study area. This is a
concern because universal service support is calculated based on a study area-
wide average of a rural telephone company that serves customers in both high
cost and low cost areas throughout its study area.
Commission Order No. 29541 at 16 (emphasis original).
Under normal circumstances, the IT A would seek further discovery in the form of
access to Edge s facilities and engineering documents to confirm that Edge has no
facilities in a number of wire centers and to test whether it is cream skimming in those
wire centers where it is providing only partial service. However, the ITA does not
believe the public interest would be well served by establishing the precedent that
competitors, or potential competitors, can use Commission proceedings as the basis for a
detailed investigation of another company s engineering records and facilities.
Presumably, Edge would agree with this sentiment.
Fortunately, the Commission seems to have anticipated this difficulty. In Order
No. 29841 , the Commission stated:
In instances where an ETC applicant seeks designation below the study level of a
rural telephone company, the Commission shall also conduct a cream skimming
analysis that compares the population density of each wire center in which the
ETC seeks designation against that of the wire centers in the study area in which
the ETC does not seek designation.
Order No. 29841 at 16 (emphasis added).
The IT A is well aware, of course, that Edge does not in its pleadings seek a designation
below the study area level. But that fact cannot be dispositive, or the Commission s rule would
be meaningless. If the mere fact that an applicant files on an entire service area, even though it
IDAHO TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR A STAFF INVESTIGATION - Page 5 of7
S:lclientsI12331198\IT A Motion for StaffInvestigation.DOC
does not intend to serve all the wire centers or the entirety of some wire centers, avoids an
appropriate cream skimming analysis, then of course that is what applicants will do , and the
Commission s legitimate concerns will never be addressed.
The IT A is also well aware that the Staff, in its Comments, did not think potential cream
skimming is a concern in this case. But that is because the Staff mistakenly took at face value
Edge s false representation that it "serves all the wire centers" covered in its Application. This
led the Staff to the erroneous conclusion that "the Company avoids the specter of cream
skimming as the Application does not include partial wire centers and addresses all wire centers
in a service area." Staff Comments at 7 (emphasis added). Investigation ofthe facts in the Edge
exhibits and on the ground would demonstrate otherwise.
Therefore, the ITA respectfully moves this Commission, pursuant to Order No. 29841
for an Order directing its Staff to conduct a further investigation to determine: (1) if Edge in fact
lacks facilities and the ability to provide service in the wire centers listed above, (2) whether
Edge is serving only the most profitable and least cost areas of those wire centers where it is
serving only a portion of the area, and (3) whether Edge s claimed Network Coverage is
accurate. The ITA further requests that the Staff be directed to issue a written report containing
its findings, to be served on all Parties who have executed the Protective Agreement.
DATED this 2Na.day of April 2007.
IDAHO TELEPHONE ASSOCIA nON'S MOTION FOR A STAFF INVESTIGA nON - Page 6 of 7
S:lclientsI12331198\ITA Motion for Staff Investigation. DOC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 25th day of April 2007, I caused to be served a true and
correct copy of the foregoing document by the method indicated below and addressed to the
following:
S. Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
Email
S. Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
Email
S. Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
Email
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 W. Washington Street
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
Mark P. Trinchero
Davis, Wright & Tremaine LLP
1300 S.W. 5th Ave., Suite 2300
Portland, OR 97201
Email: marktrinchero~dwt.com
Molly O'Leary
Richardson & O'Leary, PLLC
O. Box 7218
Boise, ID 83707
Email: molly~richardsonandoleary.com
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 25th day of April 2007, I caused to be served a true and
correct copy ofthe foregoing document ,with Page 4 and Exhibits B and C redacted, by the
method indicated below and addressed to the following:
Dean J. Miller
McDevitt & Miller LLP
420 W. Bannock Street
O. Box 2564
Boise, ID 83701-2564
Email: joe~mcdevitt-miller.com
S. Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
Email
Nathan Glazier
Regional Manager, State Affairs
AllTel Communications, Inc.
4805 Thistle Landing Dr.
Phoenix, AZ 85044
Email: nathan.g1azier~alltel.com
S. Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
Email
cA~
Michael C. Creamer
IDAHO TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION FOR A STAFF INVESTIGATION - Page 7 of 7
S:ICLIENTSI12331198\ITA Motion for Stafflnvestigation.DOC
EXHIB IT A
Conley E. Ward (ISB No. 1683)
Michael C. Creamer (ISB No. 4030)
GIVENS PURSLEY LLP
601 W. Bannock Street
O. Box 2720
Boise, ID 83701-2720
Telephone No. (208) 388-1200
Fax No. (208) 388-1300
cew~givenspursley.com
mcc~givenspursley.com
Attorneys for Idaho Telephone Association
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF
EDGE WIRELESS , LLC FOR
DESIGNATION AS AN ELIGIBLE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER
UNDER 47 US.c. 9214(e)(2)
Case No. EDG-07-
AFFIDAVIT OF DENNIS L.
THORNOCK IN SUPPORT OF IDAHO
TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION'
MOTION FOR A STAFF
INVESTIGATION
STATE OF IDAHO
) ss.
County of Ada
DENNIS L. THORNOCK, being first duly sworn upon oath, deposes and states as
follows:
1. My name is Dennis L. Thornock and I am the General Manager of Custer Telephone
Cooperative ("Custer ), headquartered in Challis, Idaho.
2. Custer is an Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier that provides telecommunications
service to subscribers throughout large portions of Custer and Lemhi Counties in Idaho. Custer
service territory is divided into four wire centers: Challis, Clayton, Elk Bend and May.
AFFIDA VIT OF DENNIS THORNOCK - Page 1 of 3
S:lclientsI12331198\Affidavit of Dennis Thornock.DOC
3. In my capacity as Custer s General Manager, I am generally familiar with the
technology and facilities required to provide cellular telephone service. I am also familiar with
the geography and topography of Custer s service area.
4. I have read the Application of Edge Wireless , LLC in the above entitled case now
before the Idaho Public Utilities Commission. On page 3 of that Application, the Applicant
states
, "
Edge serves all the wire centers in all of the rural ILEC study areas listed in Exhibit C.
All four Custer wire centers are listed in Exhibit C. (Exhibit C also erroneously lists Stanley as a
Custer wire center. That exchange is actually served by Midvale Telephone Exchange).
5. I can state with certainty that the quoted statement from the Application is false with
regard to Custer. To the best of my knowledge, Edge Wireless has no facilities at all within any
of the four Custer wire centers. Further, I can also state with certainty that providing wireless
telecommunication service to any significant portion of Custer s territory would require multiple
cell towers and other facilities.
DATED this "Z.-:5 day of April 2007.
eX' 4
Dennis L. Thornock
Subscribed and sworn to, before me, this day of April 2007.
,.""""
" "'- '0" O"""
" ~ po
......~.. '
"1
I:Q;- IP '\
1(...,.~~k1' \
:~:..s.
..:. ~~.....
#11'
:-.
: it to PU?J '" .
. .
12 :
':."'. ~. .. "".:#.
l'
.....,.... '\') .
..~ .I:t TE O~ "",
............"
Notary Public for the State of Idaho
Residing at ~L!lO ,:z::t)
My Commission Expires .5 lId-
AFFIDAVIT OF DENNIS THORNOCK - Page 2 of 3
S:lclientsI12331198\Affidavit of Dennis Thornock.DOC
EDG- T -07 -
EXHIBITS B AND C
ARE CONFIDENTIAL
AND WERE NOT
SCANNED
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 25th day of April 2007, I caused to be served a true and
correct copy of the foregoing document by the method indicated below and addressed to the
following:
Dean J. Miller
McDevitt & Miller LLP
420 W. Bannock Street
O. Box 2564
Boise, ID 83701-2564
Email: joe~mcdevitt-miller.com
u.s. Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
Email
u.S. Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
Email
S. Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
Email
S. Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
Email
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
472 W. Washington Street
O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
Mark P. Trinchero
Davis, Wright & Tremaine LLP
1300 S.W. 5th Ave., Suite 2300
Portland, OR 97201
Email: marktrinchero~dwt.com
Molly O'Leary
Richardson & O'Leary, PLLC
O. Box 7218
Boise, ID 83707
Email: molly~richardsonandoleary.com
Nathan Glazier
Regional Manager, State Affairs
AllTel Communications, Inc.
4805 Thistle Landing Dr.
Phoenix, AZ 85044
Email: nathan.glazier~al1tel.com
S. Mail
Hand Delivered
Overnight Mail
Facsimile
Email
t:ff
AFFIDA VIT OF DENNIS THORNOCK - Page 3 of 3
S:ICLIENTSI12331198\Affidavit of Dennis Thomock.DOC