Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130712Decision Memo.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER KJELLANDER COMMISSIONER REDFORD COMMISSIONER SMITH COMMISSION SECRETARY LEGAL WORKING FILE FROM:CAROLEE HALL DATE:JULY 12,2013 RE:APPLICATION FOR AN INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY OF IDAHO (“CITIZENS”)AND METROPOLITAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF IDAHO,INC.DIBIA MET TEL (“METTEL”);CASE NO.CTC-T-13-02. BACKGROUND Under the provision of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,interconnection agreements must be submitted to the Commission for approval.47 U.S.C.§252(e)(1).The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that the agreement: (I)discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement;or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest,convenience and necessity.47 U.S.C.§252(e)(2)(A).As the Commission noted in Order No.28427,companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements “may negotiate terms,prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provision of Section 251(b)or Order No.22427 at 11 (emphasis in original).This comports with the FCC’s statement that “a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the requirements of [Part 51].” 47 C.F.R.§51.3. CURRENT APPLICATION On July 9,2013,this Commission received an Application from Citizens requesting approval of its Interconnection Agreement with Metropolitan Telecommunications of Idaho,Inc. DECISION MEMORANDUM -1 -JULY 12,2013 d/b/a MetTel.See Case No.CTC-T-13-02.This Agreement sets out rates,terms and conditions for interconnection between the companies. STAFF ANALYSIS Staff has reviewed the Application for the Interconnection Agreement between the parties.Staff believes that the Interconnection Agreement is consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission,the Idaho Legislature,and Sections 251 of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.Accordingly,Staff believes that the Interconnection Agreement merits this Commission’s approval. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission agree? ca39lóHaIl L iudrncmos/intcrconncclion igrcemcncs/Cilizcns Iclecommunications Company of Idaho and Metropolitan Telecommunicalions of Idaho, (Metlel)CFC-T-13-02, DECISION MEMORANDUM JULY 12,2013