Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20080707Decision Memo.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER REDFORD COMMISSIONER SMITH COMMISSIONER KEMPTON COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF LEG AL FROM:KRISTINE A. SASSER DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE:JULY 3, 2008 SUBJECT:PETITION OF CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF IDAHO FOR EXEMPTION FROM RULE 201(02), IDAPA 31.41.01.201.02; CASE NO. CTC- T -08- On June 24 , 2008 Citizens Telecommunications of Idaho dba Frontier Communications of Idaho filed a request with the Commission, pursuant to IDAP A 31.41.01.009, seeking a permanent exemption from a provision of the Commission s Telephone Customer Relations Rule 201 , IDAP A 31.41.01.201.Specifically, the Company seeks an exemption from Rule 201.02 requiring itemization oflong distance usage and charges. THE PETITION The Company maintains in its Petition that it offers service plans that include unlimited long distance calls at a flat rate. Citizens requests discontinuance of itemized billing for its flat rate long distance customers only. Customers who do not subscribe to a flat rate toll plan and pay for long distance services based on time and distance of individual calls would continue to receive itemized billing in accordance with Rule 201.02, IDAP A 31.41.01.201.02. The Petition states that customers who wish to receive call detail for the unlimited plans may do so by contacting the Company s customer service center.In addition, the Company would make no less than 12 months of detailed billing statements available to its customers at no charge. The Company asserts that providing the details of each call adds significant printing and postage charges, makes the bills more cumbersome, and provides information that most customers do not need or want. Citizens contends that denying its petition would result in DECISION MEMORANDUM hardship to the Company who is attempting to improve customer service by reducing costs and simplifying billing. See IDAP A 31.41.01.009. ST AFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Petition be processed through Modified Procedure. COMMISSION DECISION Does the Commission wish to process Citizens ' Petition for exemption from Rule 201.02 via Modified Procedure? ~;,,~, tl ~A d~ Krist" ne A. Sasser Deputy Attorney General M:CTC-O8-02 ks DECISION MEMORANDUM