Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20101020final_order_no_32097.pdfOffice of the Secretary Service Date October 20 2010 BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CENTURYTEL OF IDAHO, INc. DBA CASE NO. CEN-IO- CENTURYLINK FOR APPROVAL OF ITS INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT WITH EL TO PIA COMMUNI CA TI 0 NS, LLC PURSUANT TO 47 U.c. ~ 252(e) IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CENTURYTEL OF THE GEM STATE CASE NO. CGS-IO- INc. DBA CENTURYLINK FOR APPRO V AL OF ITS INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT WITH EL TOPIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC PURSUANT TO 47 U.c. ~ 252(e) IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF CITIZENS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CASE NO. CTC-IO- COMPANY OF IDAHO FOR APPROVAL OF ITS INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT WITH ALLIED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION PURSUANT TO 47 U.C. ~ 252(e) IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF QWEST CORPORATION FOR CASE NO. QWE-IO- APPROVAL OF ITS INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT WITH LIBERTY-BELL TELECOM, LLC PURSUANT TO 47 U.c. ORDER NO. 32097 252(e) In this case the Commission is asked to approve separate Interconnection Agreements negotiated by CenturyTel of Idaho, Inc. dba CenturyLink and CenturyTel of the Gem State, Inc. dba CenturyLink (collectively "CenturyLink") with Eltopia Communications, LLC ("Eltopia an Interconnection Agreement between Citizens Telecommunications Company of Idaho CTC") and Allied Wireless Communications Corporation ("Allied"); and an Interconnection Agreement between Qwest Corporation ("Qwest") and Liberty-Bell Telecom, LLC ("Liberty- Bell"). With this Order, the Commission approves the parties' Interconnection Agreements. ORDER NO. 32097 BACKGROUND Under the provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, interconnection agreements, including amendments thereto, must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 U.C. ~ 252(e)(1). The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if it finds that: (1) the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement; or (2) implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. 47 U.C. ~ 252(e)(2)(A). As the Commission noted in Order No. 28427, companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements "may negotiate terms, prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provision of Section 251(b) or (c).Order No. 28427 at 11 (emphasis in original). This comports with the FCC's statement that "a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the requirements of (Part 51)." 47 C.R. ~ 51.3. THE APPLICATION 1. CenturvLink and Eltopia, Case No. CEN-I0-. On September 14, 2010 Century Link submitted dual Applications for an Interconnection and Exchange of Traffic Agreement with Eltopia. In these Applications, the parties request that the Commission approve the Agreements that include terms, conditions and pricing for interconnection, transport and termination of traffic between the companies. 2. CenturyLink and Eltopia, Case No. CGS-I0-. On September 14, 2010 Century Link submitted dual Applications for an Interconnection and Exchange of Traffic Agreement with Eltopia. In these Applications, the parties request that the Commission approve the Agreements that include terms, conditions and pricing for interconnection, transport and termination of traffic between the companies. 3. CTC and Allied, Case No. CTC-I0-. On September 24, 2010 CTC submitted an Application for a Cellular and 2-Way Mobile Radio Services Traffic Agreement with Allied. In this Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an Agreement that includes terms and conditions for the transport and termination of mobile radio service traffic in the state ofIdaho. 4. Qwest and Liberty-Bell, Case No. QWE-1O-On September 20, 2010 Qwest submitted an Application for approval of its Interconnection Agreement with Liberty- ORDER NO. 32097 Bell. In this Application, the parties request that the Commission approve an Agreement that includes terms and conditions for interconnection, unbundled network elements, ancillary services and the resale of telecommunications services within the geographical area where Qwest is the incumbent local exchange carrier ("ILEC") and is currently providing local exchange servIce. ST AFF RECOMMENDATION Staff reviewed the foregoing Applications and does not find any terms or conditions that it considers to be discriminatory or contrary to the public interest. Staff believes that the Agreements are consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission, the Idaho Legislature, and the federal Telecommunications Act. Accordingly, Staff recommends that the Commission approve the foregoing Interconnection Agreements. COMMISSION DECISION Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act, interconnection agreements including amendments thereto, must be submitted to the Commission for approval. 47 US.C. ~ 252(e)(1). However, the Commission s review is limited. The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiation only if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity. !d. Based upon our review of the Applications and Staff s recommendations, the Commission finds that the Agreements are consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity and do not discriminate. Therefore, the Commission finds that the Agreements reviewed by Staff and more fully described above, should be approved. Approval of the Agreements does not negate the responsibility of either party to these Agreements to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity if they are offering local exchange services or to comply with Idaho Code ~~ 62-604 and 62-606 if they are providing other non-basic local telecommunications services as defined by Idaho Code ~ 62-603. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Interconnection Agreement between CenturyTel of Idaho, Inc. dba Century Link, and Eltopia Communications, LLC, Case No. CEN-IO-, is approved. ORDER NO. 32097 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Interconnection Agreement between CenturyTel of the Gem State, Inc. dba CenturyLink, and Eltopia Communications, LLC, Case No. CGS-IO-, is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Interconnection Agreement between Citizens Telecommunications Company of Idaho and Allied Wireless Communications Corporation, Case No. CTC- T -10-, is approved. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Interconnection Agreement between Qwest Corporation and Liberty-Bell Telecom, LLC, Case No. QWE-IO-, is approved. THIS IS A FINAL ORDER. Any person interested in this Order (or in issues finally decided by this Order) may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order. Within seven (7) days after any person has petitioned for reconsideration, any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration. See Idaho Code ~~ 61- 626 and 62-619. DONE by Order ofthe Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise, Idaho this ;2() day of October 2010. cf! /. % JIM D. KEMPTON, PRESIDENT ~~ JJ~ ARSHA H. SMITH, COMMISSIONER MACK A. REDFORD, COMMISSIONER ATTEST: O:CEN- T -10-- CGS- T -10-- CTC- T -10-- QWE- T-I 0-- np ORDER NO. 32097