20140605final_order_no_33050.pdf

Office of the Secretary
Service Date
June 5,2014
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF )
CENTURYTEL OF IDAHO,INC.DBA )CASE NO.CEN-T-00-01
CENTURYLINK FKA CENTURYTEL OF IDAHO,)
INC.AND CENTURYTEL OF THE GEM STATE,)
INC.DBA CENTURYLINK FKA CENTURYTEL OF
THE GEM STATE -IDAHO,INC.(COLLECTIVELY )
“CENTURYLINK”)FOR APPROVAL OF )ORDER NO.33050
AMENDMENTS TO ITS INTERCONNECTION )
AGREEMENT WITH SPRINT SPECTRUM LP.)
PURSUANT TO 47 U.S.C.§252(e))
In this case,the Commission is asked to approve amendments to the Interconnection
Agreement between CenturyTel of Idaho,Inc.dha CenturyLink fka CenturyTel of Idaho,Inc.
and CenturyTel of the Gem State,Inc.dba CenturyLink fka CenturyTel of the Gem State -
Idaho.Inc.(collectively “CenturyLink’)and Sprint Spectrum L.P.(“Sprint”).With this Order,
the Commission approves the amendments to the parties’Interconnection Agreement.
BACKGROUND
Under the provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,interconnection
agreements,including amendments thereto,must be submitted to the Commission for approval.
47 U.S.C.§252(e)(l).The Commission may reject an agreement adopted by negotiations only if
it finds that the agreement:(1)discriminates against a telecommunications carrier not a party to
the agreement;or (2)implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest,
convenience and necessity.47 U.S.C.§252(e)(2)(A).As the Commission noted in Order No.
28427,companies voluntarily entering into interconnection agreements “may negotiate terms,
prices and conditions that do not comply with either the FCC rules or with the provision of
Section 25 1(b)or (c).”Order No.28427 at 11 (emphasis in original).This comports with the
FCC’s statement that “a state commission shall have authority to approve an interconnection
agreement adopted by negotiation even if the terms of the agreement do not comply with the
requirements of [Part 51].”47 C.F.R.§51.3.
THE APPLICATION
CenturyLink and Sprint jointly filed this amendment to the parties’original
Interconnection Agreement,approved by the Commission in 2000.See Order No.28448.The
ORDER NO.33050 1
parties seek Commission approval to amend the compensation portion of their Agreement.
Specifically,the companies are amending the terms,conditions,and rates to reflect the Federal
Communications Commission’s ICC Bill and Keep requirements arising out of Docket No.01-
92,In the Matter of Developing an Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime.See Application,
Attachment 1.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff reviewed the Application for approval of the aforementioned amendments to the
parties’Interconnection Agreement and does not find any terms or conditions that it considers to
be discriminatory or contrary to the public interest.Staff believes that the amendments are
consistent with the pro-competitive policies of this Commission,the Idaho Legislature,and the
federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.Accordingly,Staff recommended the Commission
approve the amendments to the Interconnection Agreement.
COMMISSION DECISION
Under the terms of the Telecommunications Act,interconnection agreements,
including amendments thereto,must be submitted to the Commission for approval.47 U.S.C.§
252(e)(1).The Commission’s review is limited,however.The Commission may reject an
agreement adopted by negotiation iy if it finds that the agreement discriminates against a
telecommunications carrier not a party to the agreement or implementation of the agreement is
not consistent with the public interest,convenience and necessity.Id.
Based upon our review of the Application and Staff’s recommendation,the
Commission finds that the amendments to the parties’Interconnection Agreement are consistent
with the public interest,convenience and necessity and do not discriminate.Therefore,the
Commission finds that the Agreement,including amendments thereto,should be approved.
Approval of an Interconnection Agreement does not negate the responsibility of either party to
an Agreement to obtain a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity if they are offering
local exchange services or to comply with Idaho Code §62-604 and 62-606 if they are
providing other non-basic local telecommunications services as defined by Idaho Code §62-603.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the amendments to the Interconnection Agreement
between CenturyTel of Idaho,Inc.dba CenturyLink fka CenturyTel of Idaho,Inc.and
CenturyTel of the Gem State,Inc.dba CenturyLink fka CenturyTel of the Gem State -Idaho,
ORDER NO.33050
Inc.(collectively “CenturyLink”)and Sprint Spectrum LP.,Case No.CEN-T-00-0l,are
approved.
THIS IS A FINAL ORDER.Any person interested in this Order (or in issues finally
decided by this Order)may petition for reconsideration within twenty-one (21)days of the
service date of this Order.Within seven (7)days after any person has petitioned for
reconsideration,any other person may cross-petition for reconsideration.See Idaho Code §§61-
626 and 62-6 19.
DONE by Order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission at Boise,Idaho this
day of June 2014.
ATTEST:
/1 /1
U
Jeh D.JewelV
Commission Secretary
O:CEN-T-OO-O1_np
k _U:
MACK A.REDFORD,M1IS STONER
a j 5L:)L
MARSHA H.SMITH,COMMISSIONER
PAUL
ORDER NO.33050 3