Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20071217_2130.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:COMMISSIONER REDFORD COMMISSIONER SMITH CO MMISSI 0 NER KEMPTON COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF FROM:DON HOWELL DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE:DECEMBER 13, 2007 SUBJECT:IDAHO POWER'S SECOND REPORT ON ITS SALE OF S02 ALLOWANCES IN 2007 AND MOTION FOR WORKSHOP, CASE NO. IPC-07- On November 9 , 2007, Idaho Power Company filed a report disclosing that the Company made a subsequent sale of 15 000 sulfur dioxide (S02) emission allowances in 2007. Report/Motion at 2. For the entire year of 2007, Idaho Power reports that it sold 35 000 S02 allowances for a total amount (less brokerage fees) of $19 642 250. Id. The after-tax amount of proceeds allocated to Idaho for S02 emissions is $10 131 560. Id. at ~ 5. This amount assumes an income tax rate of 39.095% and a jurisdictional allocation to Idaho of 94.1 %. Id. Last year the Commission approved a settlement that the S02 revenues were used to offset power purchase costs in the 2007 Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) case. In addition to its report, Idaho Power also filed a "Motion for a Workshop Schedule. Rather than utilizing the proceeds from the 2007 S02 sales to offset the PCA next year, Idaho Power "believes that other opportunities presently exist with the potential to provide greater long-term value to customers." Report/Motion at 3. If the Commission agrees that Idaho Power should investigate other potential uses for the S02 revenues, the Company "respectfully requests the Commission schedule a workshop for the purpose of receiving feedback from interested parties concerning possible alternatives to benefit customers.Id. at 4. BACKGROUND A. SO2 Allowances Title IV of the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990 established a national program for the reduction of acid rain. 42 U.C. 997651 et seq. The centerpiece of the acid rain program is DECISION MEMORANDUM the incentive- or market-based "cap and trade" S02 program. Under the cap and trade program the Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) sets a cap or ceiling on the total amount of S02 emissions allowed nationwide. Based upon this cap, EP A allocates a certain number of S02 emission allowances to thermal power plant owners. Each allowance provides the authority to emit one ton of S02. See Order No. 29852 at 1. Each year a thermal power plant owner must hold sufficient allowances to cover actual S02 emissions. A power plant owner that does not possess sufficient allowances to cover its annual emissions must purchase additional allowances or it is automatically fined and must surrender future year allowances to cover the shortfall. A thermal power plant holding surplus S02 allowances in a given year may retain the allowances or sell them. S02 allowances are fully marketable commodities and can be traded on the open market or in special EP A-sponsored auctions. Id. Idaho Power has an ownership interest in three thermal power plants in the west: Jim Bridger, North Valmy, and Boardman. B. The Prior SO2 Cases In Order No. 29852 issued in August 2005, the Commission granted Idaho Power blanket authority to sell its surplus S02 allowances. The Commission also directed that Idaho Power file a report no later than 60 days after each sale. Finally, the Commission Staff was to conduct workshops to explore the appropriate ratemaking treatment of the S02 proceeds and advise the Commission. Case No. IPC-05-20. Although the workshop participants were initially unable to reach an agreement upon the appropriate ratemaking treatment, Idaho Power, Staff, the Industrial Customers of Idaho Power and Micron reached agreement upon an appropriate ratemaking treatment. The parties proposed that the revenues from the S02 sales be included in the Company s 2006-2007 PCA mechanism, with 90% of the net proceeds to be passed on to customers and 10% of the net proceeds to be retained as a shareholder benefit. Case No. IPC-05-26. In April 2006, the Commission issued Order No. 30016 requesting public comment on the settlement proposal. In response to the Commission s Notice of Modified Procedure comments were filed by the Commission Staff, NW Energy Coalition, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the Idaho Energy Education Project, and six customers of Idaho Power. DOE supported the settlement but questioned the calculation of the credit. The NW Energy Coalition and the Idaho Energy Education Project also supported the proposed use of the sale proceeds in DECISION MEMORANDUM the PCA, but suggested the Commission consider some alternative uses for the proceeds. For example, the proceeds could be used for long-term conservation and efficiency programs measures designed to reduce the Company s coal plant emissions, acquire renewable generating resources, and implementing energy education programs in schools. Order No. 30041 at 3. After reviewing the comments, the Commission found that the PCA is the logical mechanism to track and distribute proceeds from the sale of excess S02 allowances. approving the stipulation, the Commission found that the PCA which is designed to track and true-up abnormal power supply costs and revenues is the logical mechanism to track and distribute proceeds from the sale of excess S02 allowances. S02 allowances are allocated to the Company based on the ownership and operation of its thermal/coal powered plants. Excess allowances are a direct result of many factors associated with the operation of the coal plants including installation of environmental equipment, the geographic location of the plant, the total time the plant is operated, the nature of the coal used to fuel the plant, as well as other factors. The allowances accrue as a direct result of plant operation and ownership in much the same way that energy generated from the plant is used to meet ratepayer demand and generate surplus sales revenue to offset plant-operating costs. To the extent that coal costs, environmental costs, and surplus energy sales increase/decrease(,) these costs/benefits are passed through to the customers. We find it logical that S02 allowances pass through in a similar manner. Consequently, we approve and adopt the Stipulation as a reasonable and logical method to both pass on a major portion of the proceeds to customers as well as align shareholder and ratepayer interests in obtaining the best possible price for excess allowance sales. Id. Order No. 30041 at 4 (emphasis added). The Commission also found that the 90% of allowances allocated to customers should be grossed-up to recognize the tax savings that accrues when the credit is actually provided to customers through the PCA. Id. at 5. THE MOTION FOR WORKSHOPS Although Idaho Power believes that the proceeds from the 2007 sales of S02 allowances could again be included in the next PCA, the Company suggests that the Commission consider other opportunities "with the potential to provide greater long-term value to customers. Report/Motion at 3. More specifically, Idaho Power would like to discuss at least two alternatives with other workshop participants. The first alternative is using the customer s share of the proceeds (the 90%) to purchase multi-year streams of "Renewable Energy Certificates ('green tags ) from the owners of renewable generation facilities" that have entered into PURP DECISION MEMORANDUM contracts with Idaho Power. Id. at ~ 8. "If a federal renewable portfolio standard ("RPS") is enacted, Idaho Power will be required to purchase green tags at prices expected to be higher than those existing today. ... If Idaho Power purchased green tags prior the enactment of a federal RPS or in excess thereof, the Company would sell the green tags on a short-term basis and flow the proceeds from the sales to customers through the PCA." Id. Second, Idaho Power would like to discuss the possibility of using the 90% share " buy down a portion of the rate base associated with the purchase of wind project development rights.Id. at ~ 9. Under such an approach, Idaho Power would enter into negotiations or issue a request for proposal (RFP) to purchase a permitted wind project. The Company maintains that by owning a wind project rather than purchasing equivalent energy elsewhere, customers would have additional access to renewable energy at competitive prices and retain the value of the green tags associated with such wind projects. If the Commission agrees" that Idaho Power should investigate other potential uses of the customers ' share of the S02 proceeds , then the Company requests that the Commission schedule a workshop to allow interested parties to consider possible alternatives to benefit customers. Idaho Power states that it would then report the results of such workshops to the Commission for its approval. Id. at 4. COMMISSION DECISION Is the Commission interested in examining other uses for the S02 proceeds? Does the Commission wish to schedule a workshop for interested persons to discuss Idaho Power two suggestions in addition to other uses of the proceeds? Don Howell Deputy Attorney General bls/M:IPC-O7-18 dh DECISION MEMORANDUM