The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20041102Proposed Schedule.pdfSTOEL ~ECEIVED " I L" (~J 101 S. Capitol Boulevard, Suite 1900 Boise, Idaho 83702 main 208.389.9000 fax 208.389.9040 www.stoel.com 1:0011 NO,) - Pr'; 4: 3 g ATTORNEYS AT LAW i,.i()I' .., tli~ UTI L If j ES e 0 rciff"fj S S I 01. November 1 2004 MARY S. HOBSON Direct (208) 387-4277 mshobson(f!?stoel.com VIA HAND DELIVERY Weldon Stutzman Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 West Washington Street O. Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0074 Re:AT&T Corp. et aI. v. Qwest Corporation ATT-O4- Dear Mr. Stu~t;t~ Enclosed tor the consideration of Staff and the Commission is the proposed schedule that has been worked out between Qwest and j\ l' &1'. Assuming that this meets with your approval, we respectfully request that the Commission formally adopt this proposal for use in the above referenced case. If you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours /U/~l !-/z; Mary S. ~son MSH:bll,! Enclosurecc: J\'lary V. York T. Scott Thompson Meredith R. Harris Robert M. Pomeroy Oregon Washington California Utah Boise-17T26.1 0029164-00106 Idaho Proposed Schedule for AT&T Complaint Case (IPUC Case No. ATT-04- Nov. 29--last day to serve discovery 14 calendar days after discovery served--discovery responses served Jan. 3--motions to compel filed (IF NECESSARY) Jan. 17--responses to motions to compel filed (IF NECESSARY) week of Jan. 31-- oral argument on motions to compel (IF NECESSARY) 14 days after Commission order on motion to compel-- discovery responses served in accordance with order (IF NECESSARY) THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE APPLIES ONLY IF MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARE FILED 14 days following service of discovery in response to Commission order- parties complete statement of stipulated facts 7 days later-- parties simultaneously file motions for summary judgment 14 days later-- parties simultaneously file responses to motions for summary judgment Oral argument scheduled to accommodate the calendars of the Commission and lead attorneys IN THE EVENT THE CASE IS NOT RESOLVED BY SUMMARY JUDGMENT 21 days following Commission order denying cross motions-- parties simultaneously file direct testimony 14 days later-- parties file rebuttal testimony Technical hearing scheduled to accommodate the calendar of the Commission and lead attorneys THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE APPLIES IF MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARE NOT FILED Jan. 5--deadline for parties to complete statement of stipulated facts, ifpossible Jan. 12--parties simultaneously file motions for summary judgment Jan. 26--parties simultaneously file responses to motions for summary judgment Boise-177144.20029164-00106 Oral argument scheduled to accommodate the calendars of the Commission and lead attorneys IN THE EVENT THE CASE IS NOT RESOLVED BY SUMMARY JUDGMENT 21 days following Commission order denying cross motions-- parties simultaneously file direct testimony 14 days later-- parties file rebuttal testimony Technical hearing scheduled to accommodate the calendar of the Commission and lead attorneys Boise-177144.20029164-00106