HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210503Petition for Intervenor Funding.pdfNorman M. Semanko, ISB #4761
PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER
800 West Main Street, Suite 1300
Boise,Idaho 83702
Telephone: 208.562.4900
Facsimile: 208.562.4901
N S emanlro @p ars o ns b eh I e. c o m
b oi s e do clret @p ar s ons b e hl e. co m
Attorneys for Petitioner SUEZ Water Customer Group
BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
IN THE MATTER OF SUEZ WATER
IDAHO INC.'S APPLICATION FOR
AUTHORITY TO INCREASE ITS RATES
AND CHARGES FOR WATER SERVICE
IN IDAHO
CASE NO. SUZ-W-20-02
SUEZ WATER CUSTOMER GROUP'S
PETITION FOR INTERVENOR
FTINDING
COMES NOW, SUEZ Water Customer Group (hereinafter "SWCG" or "the Customer
Group"), through the undersigned counsel of record, pursuant to Idaho Code $ 6l-617 A and Rules
053 and 161 through 165 of the Rules of Procedure of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission
("IPUC" or "the Commission"), Idaho Administrative Code ("IDAPA") 31.01.01, and hereby
petitions the Commission for an award of intervenor funding.
A. Backeround
SWCG is an unincorporated nonprofit association, formed and recognized under the laws
of the State of Idaho, composed of ratepayers and customers of the Applicant, for the purpose of
opposing and responding to the proposed rate increase on SUEZ Water Idaho customers. SWCG
members stood to be impacted by the significant rate increases contained in the Application. If
granted as proposed, these rate increases would have averaged 22.3% across-the-board. SWCG
SUEZ WATER CUSTOMER GROUP,S PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING _ Page I
481 l-8134-8839.v3
filed apetition to intervene seeking denial ofthe Application to approve the proposed rate increase,
which petition was granted by the IPUC.
In accordance with IPUC Rule 053(07)(a), the facts upon which this Petition is based are
delineated below, along with the relevant legal authority upon which they are based.
In accordance with IPUC Rule 053(07)(d), the entity against which this Petition is brought
is identified as Applicant SUEZ Water Idaho, Inc. ("Applicant" or "SUEZ Water Idaho").
B. Award of Costs of Intervention and Case in Which Intervenors May Applv for
Fundine
Idaho Code $ 6l-617A(2) and IPUC Rule 161 are met because SUEZ Water Idaho is a
regulated water utility with gross Idatro intrastate annual revenues exceeding $3,500,000.
C. Itemized List of Expenses
Pursuant to IPUC Rule 162(01), following is an itemized list of SWCG's costs and fees
Itemized legal work performed durins Rate Case proceedings Hours
Review Rate Case Application and Direct Testimony
Review Commission Notices and Orders
Prepare Petition to Intervene
Review Petitions to Intervene, motions and responses filed by other parties
Review Production Requests and Reponses
Meetings and communications with PUC Staffand other parties
Meetings and communications with client goup members
Participate in settlement meetings and discussions with intervenors/staff
Participate in drafting and review of settlement proposals/counter proposals
Review and comment on settlement stipulation
Review testimony submifted in support of settlement and prepare for hearing
Participate in Customer Hearing and Technical Hearing
Total hours worked - Norman M. Semanko
Legal Fees: 49.0 hrs. @$2251fu.r : $11,025
1.5
1.3
1.0
0.9
1 1.1
5.5
1.2
20.7))
0.6
1.0
2.0
49.0
I Norman M. Semanko's services were billed at a discounted rate of $225hotr (standard rate is
$405/hour).
SUEZ WATER CUSTOMER GROUP'S PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING -Page2
481 l-8134-8839.v3
D. Statement of Pronosed Findings and Material Contribution Therefrom
ln accordance with IPUC Rule 162(02), the proposed findings and recommendations of
SWCG can be found n SWCG's Petition to Intervene datdNovember 10,20201' namely, that the
Applicant's proposed rate increase of 22.3%o is unjust and unreasonable and threatens to impose
considerable o'rate shock" on SUEZ Water Idaho customers, and should therefore not be granted
by the Commission.
SWCG maintained this position throughout the proceedings, thereby confibuting
materially to the settlement that was agreed to by the parties and proposed to the Commission. As
adopted by the Commission, this settlement resulted in ajust and reasonable rate increase of 3.55%
in the first year and an additional increase of 5.2% in the second year, for a total rate increase of
8.75o/o. This is substantially lower than the rate increase proposed in the Application.
The requirement of Idaho Code $ 6l-617 A(z)(a) is satisfied because said proposed findings
and recommendations materially contributed to the decision rendered by the Commission.
E. Statement Showinq Costs
The fees and costs SWCG seeks to recover - as detailed above - are reasonable and, as
such, meet the requirements of Idatro Code $ 6l-617A(2)O) and IPUC Rule 162(03). Attorney
Norman M. Semanko's standard hourly rate is $405 per hour, but in this case his services were
rendered at a discounted rate of $225 per hour, resulting in legal fees totaling $11,025 for 49.0
hours of time performing work in this matter. No witness fees or reproduction costs were incurred.
F. Explanation of Cost Statement and Statement of Financial Hardship
SWCG's funding, as an unincorporated nonprofit association, comos predominantly from
individuals, most of whose contributions are unpredictable, sporadic, and limited in amount.
SWCG has incurred reasonable, but still considerable, expenses participating in this important
SUEZ WATER CUSTOMER GROUP,S PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING _ Page 3
481 l-8134-8839.v3
proceeding. Even with intervenor funding, participation in this IPUC case constitutes a significant
hardship because SWCG has incurred these expenses during the course of the proceeding.
The fees and costs identified above constitute a significant financial hardship for SWCG,
and the requirements of Idaho Code $ 6l-617A(2Xb) and IPUC Rule 162(04) are met.
G. Statement of Difference
The IPUC Staffprovided valuable technical analysis regarding the proposed rate increase
and the Applicant's revenue requirements in this matter. Its role and position differed from those
of the Intervenors. The Staff was an effective intermediary between the Intervenors and the
Applicant.
While other Intervenors were focused on various issues related to this mattetr, SWCG
consistently took the position that the proposed rate increase was much too high, and therefore
unjust and unreasonable. An across-the-board rate increase of 22.3% threatened to impose
considerable "rate shock" on SUEZ Water Idatro customers, both for residential and commercial
customers still suf[ering through the impacts of the COVID-I9 pandemic. In particular, SWCG
maintained that the rate increase should be much smaller than proposed and, ideally, phased-in so
that the rate increase could be as small as possible during the first year, hopefully encompassing
the remaining days ofthe pandonic and its economic impacts. This difference in focus contributed
materially to the settlement stipulation that was ultimately accepted by the Commission.
The requirements of ldaho Code $ 6l-617fu(2)(c) and IPUC 162(05) are met by the clear
dif[erence between SWCG's proposed findings from those of Staff and the other parties.
II. Statement of Recommendation: SWCG Addressed Issues of Concern to the
General Bodv of Users and Consumers
SWCG's position addressed issues of concern to the general body of utility users and
consumers. As noted previously, SWCG is an unincorporated nonprofit association, composed of
SUEZ \MATER CUSTOMER GROUP,S PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING _Page 4
481 l-8 134-8839.v3
ratepayers and customers. SWCG's position against the 22.3Yo rate increase proposed in the
Application is because it is unjust and unreasonable, risking imposing "rate shock" on residential
and commercial customers, including those who are struggling with the economic impacts of the
COVID-I9 pandemic. All of these are issues of concern to SWCG users and customers. As such
the requirernents of Idaho Code $ 61-617A(2)(d) and IPUC Rule 162(06) have been met.
I. Statement of Showine Class of Customer
To the extent SWCG represents a specific SUEZ Water ldaho customer class, it is the
residential class. IPUC Rule 162(07).
J. Awards
The specific requirements of Idaho Code $ 61-617A(2H5) and IPUC Rule 165(01)(af(e)
have been met as indicated above.
The award of intervenor funding is requested to be paid within twenty-eight (28) days of
the order of the IPUC awarding intervenor funding. IPUC Rule 165(02).
The award of intervenor funding paid by SUEZ Water Idaho will be an allowable
business/rate case expense and shall be chargeable to the class of customers represented by the
intervenors. IPUC Rule 165(03).
This Petition is permitted, as SWCG is not in direct competition with SUEZ Water Idaho
and thus payment of SWCG's expenses is not prohibited by Idaho Code $ 61-617A(5).
WHEREFORE, Petitioner SWCG, pursuant to Idaho Code $ 6l-617A(5) and IPUC Rule
053(07)(c), includes the following prayer for relief:
1. For an award of intervenor funding to SWCG in the amount of $11,025 against
Applicant SUEZ Water Idaho as follows:
2. That such award of intervenor funding be paid within twenty-eight (28) days of the
order of the IPUC awarding intervenor funding;
SUEZ WATER CUSTOMER GROUP,S PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING _ Page 5
481 l-8134-8839.v3
3. That such award of intenrenor fimding be an allowable business/rate case exlrense
and be chargeable to the class of customers re,prosented by thc intervenors; and
4. For such other and further relief as the IPUC may determine to be just and proper.
DATED this 3d day of May, 2021.
PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER
-\
By:
Norman M. Semanko
SUEZ WATER CUSTOMER. GROUP'S PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FLJNDING - Page 6
4El1-813,1-8839.v3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certiry that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served on the
following on this 3'd day of May, 202l,by the following method:
Jan Noriyuki
Commission Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
47 2 W est Washington Street
Boise, ID 83702
s e c r e t ary @puc. i d a h o. g ov
j an. noriyuki@puc. idaho. gov
Dayn Hardie
Matt Hunter
Deputy Attorneys General
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
11331W. ChindenBlvd.
Building No. 8, Suite 201-,{ (83714)
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, ID 83720-0074
d ayn. h ar di e @pu c. i d a h o. gov
matt. hunter@puc. idaho. gov
Michael C. Creamer
Preston N. Carter
Givens Pursley LLP
P .O. Box 2720
Boise, ID 83702-2720
mc c @giv ens purs I ey. c o m
pr e s t o n c ar t e r @giv ens pur s I ey. c o m
David Njuguna
Manager Regulatory Business
Suez Water Management & Services
461 From Road, Suite 400
Paramus, NJ 07052
D av i d. nj u g an a @S u e z. c o m
Lorna Jorgensen
John Cortabitarte
Ada County Prosecuting Attorney's Office
200 W. Front Street, Room 3191
Boise, ID 83702
lj orgensen@adaco unty. id. qov
j cortab itarte@,adacounty. i d. qov
U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid
U.S. Certified Mail, Postage Prepaid
Federal Express
Hand Delivery
Electronic Mail or CN{/ECF
E U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid
U.S. Certified Mail, Postage Prepaid
Federal Express
Hand Delivery
[] Electronic Mail or CIWECF
E U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid
U.S. Certified Mail, Postage Prepaid
Federal Express
Hand Delivery
I Electronic Mail or CIWECF
trtr U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid
U.S. Certified Mail, Postage Prepaid
Federal Express
Hand Delivery
Electronic Mail or CM/ECF
U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid
U.S. Certified Mail, Postage Prepaid
Federal Express
Hand Delivery
Electronic Mail or CM/ECF
ntrtrtrx
trtrtrtrx
SUEZ WATER CUSTOMER GROUP,S PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING _ PageT
481 l-8134-8839.v3
Mary Grant
Deputy City Attorney
Boise City Attorney's Ofiice
105 N. Capitol Blvd.
Boise,ID 83701-0500
boisecityattorney@cityattornev.ore
Scott B. Muir
Deputy City Attorney
Boise City Attorney's Office
105 N. Capitol Blvd.
Boise,ID 83701-0500
boisecitvattornev@citvattornev.ore
Brad M. Purdy
Attorney at Law
2019 N. 17ft Street
Boise,ID 83702
bmpurdy@hotmail.com
Jim Swier
Greg Harwood
Micron Technology Inc.
8000 South Federal Way
Boise, lD 83707
jswier@micron.com
gbharwood@micron.som
Austin Rueschhoff
Thorvald A. Nelson
Holland & Hart, LLP
555 17th Street, Suite 3200
Denver, CO 80202
darueschho ff@ho I I andhart. com
tnelson@hollandhart. com
aclee@hollandhart. com
el garganoamari@hollandhart. com
U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid
U.S. Certified Mail, Postage Prepaid
Federal Express
Hand Delivery
Electronic Mail or CIU/ECF
U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid
U.S. Certified Mail, Postage Prepaid
Federal Express
Hand Delivery
[l Electronic Mail or CIWECF
U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid
U.S. Certified Mail, Postage Prepaid
Federal Express
Hand Delivery
Electronic Mail or CIVI/ECF
U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid
U.S. Certified Mail, Postage Prepaid
Federal Express
Hand Delivery
Electronic Mail or CN{/ECF
U.S. First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid
U.S. Certified Mail, Postage Prepaid
Federal Express
Hand Delivery
Electronic Mail or CIU/ECF
trtrtrtrx
trtr
trtrtrtrx
trx
1
Norman M. Semanko
SUEZ WATER CUSTOMER GROUP,S PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING _ PAge 8
481 l-8134-8839.v3