Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20211115Petition for Intervenor Funding.pdfJames M. Piotrowski Marty Durand PIOTROWSKI DURAND, PLLC P.O. Box 2864 1020 W. Main Sneet, Suite 370 Boise,Idatro 83701 Telephone: (208)33 1 -9200 Facsimile: (208)3 3 l -9201 iames(didunionlaw.com martvtOidunionlaw. com Attorneys for lntervenor Citizens Allied for Integrity and Accountability IN TITE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF SUEZ WATER IDAIIO AhID EAGLE WATER COMPAI\IY FORTHE ACQIIISITION OF EAGLE WATER COMPAI\IY i'l t L:1it.'U'lJ ii;iil':Y I5 Pfl tr: l+? -, .,1 ,a t.-,,'.1 -=1 t'-:''- ,-lr,i:.:r3;d:l0N BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION cAsE NOS. SUZW-18-02 EAG-W-I8-01 INTERVENOR CITIZENS ALLIED FOR INTEGRITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY'S PETITION FOR INTERVENOR FUNDING I. INTRODUCTION COMES NOW, the Citizens Allied for Integrity and Accountability (CAIA) and, pursuant to Idaho Code $ 6l-617A and Rules 16l-165 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure, IDAPA 31.01.01.161-!65,petitions this Commission for an award of intervenor funding in the above-captioned proceeding. CAIA timely submits this application pursuant to IPUC Rule 164. II. BACKGROUND CAIA was granted leave to intervene as a party to this proceeding by IPUC Order 34229 on January 10,2019. CAIA petitioned to intervene consistent with its mission to protect the 1 public interest by preserving private property rights, public health, safety and critical natural resources. Throughout the duration of this case, CAIA engaged in every aspect including, but not limited to, analyses of the issues and parties involved, reviewing the purchase aglee,ments, researching water quality and customer senrice, reviewing the proposed rates and the impact that such an increase would have on Eagle Water's low-income rate payers. CALA reviewed numerous written testimonies and reviewed hundreds of pages of disclosure documents. CALA conducted discovery, participated in several inta/inter-party teleconferences including settlement negotiations; the latter of which did not lead to agreement by the intervenors. III. PROCEDURAL RE,QTIIREMENTS A. Rule 16l Requirements 0DAPA 31.01.01.161): Suez is a regulated water public utility with gross Idaho intrastate annual revenues exceeding three million, five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000.00). B. Rule 162 Requirements: (01) Itemized list of Expenses Consistent with Rule 162(01) of the Commission's Rules of Procedure, an itemized list of all expenses incurred by CAIA in this proceeding is attached hereto as Exhibit A which was prepared from data maintained in Piohowski Durand, PLLC's time and invoicing system, which in tum is the result of contemporaneously entered time records. Exhibit A refleots the date, the time spent, the tasks perfonned and the person performing the tasks. 63MD' refers Marty Durand and "JP" refers to James Piotrowski. Attomeys for CAIA spent a total of 69.3 hours on this matter. 2 (02) Statement of Proposed Findings Throughout the process of this proceeding, CAIA consistently opposed the acquisition of Eagle Water by Suez for numerous reasons, including lack of transparency, equity, water quality, local contol, and rate shock. As the Settlement Stipulation provides, Suez and Staffultimately agreed to a significantly longer rate phase in period. CAIA continued to object to the acquisition while advocating for a longer phase should the acquisition be approved. CAIA asks the Commission to deny the application in the absence of full disclosure of interested parties and terms. The public has been denied information necessary for ffirmed input. It is difficult to propose any meaningful solutions, amendments or altematives when so much remains hidden from public view. A letter from Suez and Violia to the Commission was provided in response to CAIA's Request for Production. @xhibit 405 attached to CAIA Comments on Joint Application for Acquisition.) This is, apparenfly, the only statement made public regarding the SuezA/eolia merger. Without CAIA's intervention, the public would have no information at all regarding the merger. CAIA is alarmed at the lack of tansparency and asks the Commission to deny the acquisition: a. The Acquisition Application does not clearly disclose what operational a relationship will exist betw'een Suez and Veolia. The public has been denied the opportunity to comment on the entire acquisition and merger. b. The Acquisition Application does not clearly disclose the details of the sale to and settlement with H2O Eagle Water. Eagle Water customers have been denied information of the 3 true cost and compensation to unknown middlemen and how this impacts rates and conflicts of interest. c. The surcharge distribution is not equitable and based solely on convenience to Suez. Alternatives should be fully explored. (03) Statement Showing Costs: CAIA submits that the costs it seeks to recover through this Petition are reasonable. Piohowski Durand, LLP, CAIA's legal counsel have been practicing in ldaho for 25 and 26 years respectively and have extensive experience and a unique combination of knowledge and skills in administrative law, litigation and public policy, that very few lawyers possess. The majority of the firms's work is performed on an hourly basis with rates ranging from $150 per hotr (for a single client with unique circumstances), to $350 per hour for work in complex areas of law, particularly litigation of difficult statutory claims arising under federal law. Recent fee award decisions include rates ranging from $300 per hour in Citizens Allted for Integrity and Accountabtlity v. Thomas Schultz, Director of the Department of Lands, et al.,Case No. l7-cv-00264-BLW, United States Dishict Court for the District of ldaho, to $350 per hour in K.W. v. Armstrong, Case No. 1:12-cv-00022-BLW, United States Distriot Court for the District of Idaho. Hourly fees of $200 are reasonable for this case, reflecting the local market as well as the nature of the matter. In addition, CAIA seeks no costs through this Petition. CAIA fully participated in every aspect of this proceeding from start to finish and provided input and asserted issues not raised by Staffand other parties. For the reasons stated herein, CAIA respectfrrlly submits that the costs it seeks to recover as set forth in Exhibit A are reasonable. 4 (04) Explanation of Cost Statement: CAIA is a non-profit organization under IRS Code 501(c)(3). CALA has no paid staff and relies on grants, contibutions and recovery of fees to fund its work to protect the public interest in natural resources. CAIA does not have the financial ability to intervene on behalf of the public in matters such as ttris without the opportunity to recover costs and fees as allowed by PUC Rule 165. CAIA has no direct monetary stake in the outcome of this or any other proceedhg before the Commission in the sense that it does not represent for-profit businesses or advocacy groups, directly or indirectly, representing for-profit business interests. (05) Statement of Difference: CAIA's proposed findings differ greatly from the recommendation of Staff and the Settlement Proposal. As with any case at least partially resolved through settlement details of positions taken during settlement negotiations typically cannot be revealed or otherwise disclosed outside of the settlement process. CAIA objects to the acquision of Eagle Water by Suez as water quallty and customer service will suffer. The acquisition amount has not been independently reviewed and terms of the acquisition have not been disclosed. The proposed acquisition is not just, reasonable or in the public interest. Should the acquisition be approved, CAIA believes a longer phase in should be allowed to address rate shock, especially for low income customers, and a more equitable distribution of surcharge funds should be explored and adopted. (06) Statement of Recommendation: CAIA's recommendations address issues of transparency, equity, rate shock, water qualrty and local conffol, all of which are of concern to the general body of utility users and consumers. Public utilities should enjoy the tust of the public they serve. [,ack of transparency 5 impacts the public tust and all water customers have a strong interest in use and management of limited natural resources. (07) Statement Showing Class of Customer: CAIA intervened on behalf of members and Eagle Water customers who will experience rate shock and reduced water qualrty. CALA intervened on behalf of members and Suez customers in the area who seek transparency in the operation of public utilities. CAIA intervened on behalf of members and low and fixed income Eagle Water customers who will suffer the greatest impact of significant rate increases. CAIA intervened on behalf of members and utility customers who seek to maintain local contol of limited public resources. IV. CONCLUSION CAIA intervened to protect important public interests and has participated in every step of the process. CAIA's intervention resulted in disclosure of documents and consideration of rate shock and impacts on limited income customers. The ftrnding requested is reasonable and CAIA asks the IPUC to approve this Application. Dated this 15ft day ofNovember, 2021. Vuh^ L)i.,trrnrrrJ i,larty durana 6 CERTTFICATE OF' SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 156 day of October,Z}2l,a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was served on the following via electronic mail: Jan Noriyuki Commission Secretary Idatro Public Utilities Commission secretary@Fuc. idatro. eov j an.noriyuki@nuc.idaho. gov Erick Shaner Dayn Hardie Deputy Attorney General Dayn.hardie@nuc.idaho. gov Erick. shaner@.Fuc.idatro. gov Marshall Thompson Suez Water Idaho,Inc. marshall.thompson@suez.com Molly O'Leary Eagle Water Company, Inc. mol ly@bizcounseloratlaw.com Robert DeShazo, Jr. Eagle \Mater Company, Inc. eaglewaterco@ gmail.com N.L. Bangle H2O Eagle Acquisitions, LLC nbanelefahz0-solutionsllc.net Jason Pierce Mayor, City of Eagle i pierce@cityofeaqle. ore tosborn@cityo fea gle.or g 7 B. Newall Squyres Munay D. Feldman Holland & Hart, LLP City of Eagle nsquyres @hollandhart. com mfeldman@hollandhart. com Norman Semanko Parsons Behle & Lattimer Eagle Water Customer Group nsemanko@oarsonsbehle.com ecf@.parsonsbeh le. com Mary Grant Scott B. Muir Boise City Attorney's Office boisecitvattorney@cityofboise. org Preston Ca.rter Givens Pursley, LLP Suez Water Idaho,Inc. mcc@ givenspursley.com prestoncarter@ givenspursley. com klo,h, {r),,,rnr r} Marry-$uiand - 8 PIOTROVVSKI DURAND, PLLC P.O. Box 2864 Boise, lD 83701 (208) 331-9200 TA)( ID #4'749',t4076 lnvoie submitted to: CAIA Eagle Water Utility November 15,2021 ln Reference To: lnvoice # 2064,0 Professional Services u3nu9 JP Drafted substitution of counsel; reviewed and responded to email messages from counse!; reviewed and responded to email messages from client; further reviewed Suez filings; legal research 2t21t2019 JP Legal research; drafted motion for extension of discovery deadlines 2l2A2Ug JP Drafted motion forextension of discoverydeadlines 711412021MD Review PUC pleadings and testimony 712512021MD review pleadings and testimonies, research "public interesf' 71261202'l MD reviewtestimony and draft memo 811912021 MD review documents from client and petitions 812012021MD draft notice of appearance, review discovery response Rate 200.00/hr 1.70 200.00/hr 1.20 200.00/hr 1.30 200.00/hr 2.00 200.00/hr 1.00 200.00/hr 2.00 200.00/hr 0.50 200.00/hr 0.50 Hours Amount 340.00 240.00 260.00 400.00 200.00 400.00 100.00 100.00 812312021MD review pleadings and attend conference with all parties 200.00/hr 2.00 400.00 CAIA Eagle Water Utility 8t24t2021MD Telephone conference with other intervenor, email other intervenor re opposition to modified procedure, download and review discovery materials; emailclient; review information on Veolia 8t26t2021MD review discovery responses re assets, review information from client; draft information request; check on confidentiality agreement 813012021MD finish information request and serve on Suez 8t31t2021MD Conference on PUC decision re modified proceedings, Telep hone conference with potential witness, review protective agreement and sign, email client with update 9t14t202',t MD attend settlement conference, review d iscovery responses, update client 911512021 MD review discovery responses for base rate calculations 911612021 MD review and select discovery re rate base and sale 9t2112021MD review discovery responses, check prior discovery responses for info, check Vfoming SOS for H2O Eagle Acquisitions information 912212021 MD review discovery and find info on H20 Eagle, 9t23t202'.t MD check discovery responses and email O'Leary for unredacted contract 9t271202'.t MD gather relevant documents, outline comments, review Suez counter proposal, email client, emailother intervenor 91291202',t MD send summary to client, review updated phase in tables from Staff, email other intervenor 101312021MD Telephone conference with client re update '|.01412021 MD work on comments, attend intervenor settlement discussion 101512021MD attend settlement conference and work on comments, attend evening workshop 200.00/hr Page 2 Hours Amount 500.00 2.50 Rate 200.00/hr 2.50 200.00/hr 1.30 200.00/hr 1.00 200.00/hr 2.50 200.00/hr 1.00 200.00/hr 1.30 200.00/hr 3.00 200.00/hr 2.00 200.00/hr 0.50 200.00/hr 2.30 200.00/hr 1.00 200.00/hr 0.40 200.00/hr 2.50 200.00/hr 3.00 500.00 260.00 200.00 500.00 200.00 260.00 600.00 400.00 100.00 460.00 200.00 80.00 500.00 600.00 101612021MD research PUC rules for comments and exhibits 200.00/hr 1.00 200.00 CAIA Eagle Water Utility fin2021MD review public pleadings and confidential discovery for accounting reviews, review settlement agreement and send to client 10/1112021MD research PUC and work on comments, respond to client inquiry 10fiA2021MD check about amended schedule, work on comments, mail copy to client 1011312021MD research and work on comments 1011812021MD review notice of settlement and hearing order, send to client 1012012021MD work on comments and identiffing exhibits 1012112021MD finish comments, clean up cites, send to client for review 1012512021 MD revise comments, send to client for review; find confidentiality agreement and send to Suez. 1012612021MD finish comments, Telephone conference with client, order exhibits and prepare for filing 1012712021MD reorder exhibits, revise comments, file with PUC, review Staff comments, emailclient 111112021MD attend public meeting (via phone) 'l1l8l2021MD review Suez response to comments, start drafting fee petition 111912021MD work on fee petition, review rules 1111012021MD finish fee petition For professional services rendered Balance due Rate Page 3 Hours Amount 400.00 2.00200.00/hr 600.00 200.00/hr 3.00 700.00 200.00/hr 3.50 400.00 200.00/hr 2.00 100.00 200.00/hr 0.50 600.00 200.00/hr 3.00 500.00 200.00/hr 2.50 500.00 200.00/hr 2.50 500.00 200.00/hr 2.50 200.00 200.00/hr 1.00 300.00 200.00/hr 1.50 400.00 200.00/hr 2.00 400.00 200.00/hr 2.00 260.00 200.00/hr 1.30 69.30 $13,860.00 To insure proper credit, please include invoice number on your payment. Thank you. $13,860.00