20221104Comments(8)_8.pdf

From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Friday, November 4, 2022 7:00:08 AM
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: David Vinson
Submission Time: Nov 4 2022 2:07AMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 3804 W NORMANDIE DRIVE
BOISE, ID 83705
Name of Utility Company: Veolia
Case ID: VEO-W-22-02
Comment: "Before such a large increase in cost could even be considered I would like to know how the money is to be used. The suggested increase is not justified given the lack of
information Veolia has provided about how the money will be invested. Also, customers of Veolia's system should not be responsible for financing Veolia's acquisition of Eagle's system.
That should be entirely separate and not paid for via current customers."
------
Name: Constantine MavromichalisSubmission Time: Nov 3 2022 9:53PM
Email: [e-mail]: 208-420-3629
Address: 1100 Berkeley StreetBoise, ID 83705
Name of Utility Company: Veolia
Case ID: VEO-W-22-02
Comment: "1. The increase is not justified given the information Veolia has provided about
how the money will be invested in the system 2. Legacy customers of Veolia should not be responsible for financing Veolia’s acquisition of Eagle’s system"
------
Name: Kurtis Cantley
Submission Time: Nov 3 2022 10:40PMEmail: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]Address: 6843 S Lone Tree Way
Boise, ID 93709
Name of Utility Company: Veolia
Case ID: VEO-W-22-02
Comment: "A significant increase in water rates has not been appropriately justified by Veolia. Their statement about how additional revenue will be used to improve the water
system does not align with the actual plan, which includes things such as standard maintenence that should already be part of the rate. In addition, existing customers should not
be financing their acquisition of the Eagle Water Company."
------
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Friday, November 4, 2022 2:00:07 PM
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Rhet Hulbert
Submission Time: Nov 4 2022 1:06PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 11325 W Hickory Loop Dr
Boise, ID 83713
Name of Utility Company: Veolia
Case ID: VEO-W-22-02
Comment: "I do not agree with the proposed large fee increase. First, such a large increase is
not justified given the information Veolia has provided about how the money will be invested
in the system. Second, legacy customers of Veolia's system should not be responsible for
financing Veolia's acquisition of Eagle's system. Third, it appears that this 24% fee increase
will result in 23% increased profits for Veolia. This is not how a "public utility" is supposed to
work. We can not continue to let private companies buy public assets and then turn around and
charge the public higher fees just to increase their profits. Thanks."
------
Name: Daniel BatesSubmission Time: Nov 4 2022 1:43PM
Email: [e-mail]: 208-314-6868
Address: 2017 South Ridge Point WayBoise, ID 83712
Name of Utility Company: Veolia
Case ID: VEO-W-22-02
Comment: "I do not agree with the proposed large fee increase. First, such a large increase is
not justified given the information Veolia has provided about how the money will be invested in the system. Second, legacy customers of Veolia's system should not be responsible for
financing Veolia's acquisition of Eagle's system. Third, it appears that this 24% fee increase will simply result in increased profits for Veolia. This is not how a "public utility" is supposed
to work. We can not continue to let private foreign companies buy public assets and then turn around and charge the public higher fees just to increase their profits. Thanks."
Name: Erica HulbertSubmission Time: Nov 4 2022 1:48PM
Email: [e-mail]: 208-866-2084
Address: 11325 W Hickory Loop DrBOISE, ID 83713
Name of Utility Company: Veolia
Case ID: VEO-W-22-02
Comment: "Please do not approve this rate increase. I am so tired of citizens having to pay
higher prices so that CEOs and board members can report higher earnings and increase their own wealth. It needs to stop. Veolia has not demonstrated an actual need for a rate increase, so
please don't give it to them. Thank you."
------
From:PUCWeb Notification
To:Jan Noriyuki
Subject:Notice: A comment was submitted to PUCWeb
Date:Friday, November 4, 2022 3:00:06 PM
The following comments were submitted via PUCWeb:
Name: Maureen Stephenson
Submission Time: Nov 4 2022 2:59PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 11059 W. Hickory Drive
Boise, ID 83713
Name of Utility Company: Veolia
Case ID: VEO-W-22-02
Comment: "I do not agree with the proposed large fee increase. First, such a large increase is
not justified given the information Veolia has provided about how the money will be invested
in the system. Sorry, some of the message got cut off. Second, legacy customers of Veolia's
system should not be responsible for financing Veolia's acquisition of Eagle's system. Third, it
appears that this 24% fee increase will simply result in increased profits for Veolia. This is not
how a "public utility" is supposed to work. We can not continue to let private foreign
companies buy public assets and then turn around and charge the public higher fees just to
increase their profits. Thank you for your careful consideration of this matter. "
------
Name: Christian Grey
Submission Time: Nov 4 2022 2:04PM
Email: [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Address: 3819 E Parkcenter Blvd
Boise, ID 83716
Name of Utility Company: Veolia
Case ID: VEO-W-22-02
Comment: "Such a large increase is not justified given the information Veolia has provided
about how the money will be invested in the system. Legacy customers of Veolia’s system
should not be responsible for financing Veolia’s acquisition of Eagle’s system."
------