HomeMy WebLinkAbout20111012Comments.pdfSeptember 29, 2011 RECEIV
563 W Bogus View Drive
Eagle, ID 83616
2011 OCT 12 AM 8: 26
IDAHO
Uïlllï!ES
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
P.O. Box 83720-0074
Re: Untied Water Application to Increase Rates
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing in response to the request by United Water to increase water rates by
roughly 19% to its customers.
I find this rate increase request startling. What I know is that I am on a fixed
retirement income and have not seen any inflation adjustments in the last 4 years
but costs are increasing in most areas of my life. I also ran a public facilty that often
had little or no increase in funding but demand increased at or above the rate of
inflation. In order to meet our mission, we had to reduce internal costs and mange
our resources with severe scrutiny not just in one, but also over several years. We
succeeded and not only managed within our budget but also improve the quality of
our service to more of those so entitled. Good things happen when you pay
attention to costs and service. As a bit of evidence of a potential lack of oversight in
cost containments, I received two copies of the Notice of Application to Increase
Rates in my last bilL. That is trivial thing to be sure but does raise the question that
oversight and internal controls may be lax. I see nothing in the United Water that
addresses conservation of internal costs. Moreover, if United Water was paying
attention to the economy, the timeline for implementing new or expanded services
should have been stretched. I find that last point curious as the utilities have
extensive and acCurate planning information. Without a plan for current and futlf
expenditure reductions/management, I cannot support this request and urge the
PUC to do the same. Show us how United Water is controlling and reducing costs
then send in the request.
Regards,
The proposed increase in rates is subject to review and a decision by the
IPUC, which may accept, modify or reject in whole or in part the proposed
increase. A complete copy of the proposal is available at the Company's
office at 8248 W. Victory Road, Boise, Idaho and at the Commission's office
at 472 W. Washington, Boise, Idaho. It is also available on-line at the IPUC
website: http://www.puc.idaho.gov, by following the links for "Water" and
"Open Water Cases," and at United Water Idaho's website:
http://www.unitedwater.com/idaho.
You can also file a comment on the Application via the IPUC website or mail
comments to:
ør
o("..::0mom
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
P.O. Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
r-=----
N
Sincerely,:i:i
co..Nco
;-;i.":
Greg Wyatt
Vice President and General Managerb;./A ~k L~~ß~ ~ WL.~c/~~
~!.d~~. biI~ rt ~ ~h- t1~~ ~~
~t ~. iÙt1/ ¥ ~ /i~ ~It '- . Wit IL ~( NÒ J )~ ~.~~dLc/~t5~
~ - S ' il14 hJ ~ lùdt(
Jean Jewell
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
n_sprack~yahoo.com
Wednesday, October 12, 20111:23 AM
Jean Jewell; Beverly Barker; Gene Fadness
PUC Comment Form
A Comment from Nathaniel Spracklen follows:
-- - - - - - --- --- --- - - -- - --- - - - -- - --- ---
Case Number: UWI-W-11-02
Name: Nathaniel Spracklen
Address: 7985 W McMullen
City: Boise
State: Idaho
Zip: 83709
Daytime Telephone: 208-422-6502
Contact E-Mail: nsprack~ahoo.com
Name of Utility Company: UNITED WATER IDAHO
Acknowledge: acknowledge
Please describe your comment briefly:
i just moved in a couple months ago(4) and have already paid their annual average. They are
lying to this commission. Mabey not blatantly, anyone can percieve a statistic in a certain
light. But they are not telling you the complete truth! Homeowner i s are getting the worst
of this as we are indi vidualy billed. Common sense will tell you thousands of people living
in apartments will not reflect the average homeowner(fewer in this economy) expense. Nobody
is not in a position to have more expenses, nobody is getting raises in today' s economy.
They don i t need our hard earned money to support another state i s economy. This Idaho
commision needs to protect Idahoans, not systemically syphen our resources($$$) to anotherstate.
The form submitted on http://ww . puc. idaho. gov Iforms/ipuc1/ipuc. html
IP address is 140.153.203.4-- - --- - -- - --- --- - - - - - -- - - - - --- - -- - --
i
Jean Jewell
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
barryandkeri~msn. com
Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:08 PM
Jean Jewell; Beverly Barker; Gene Fadness
PUC Comment Form
A Comment from Barry C. Hanson follows:
Case Number: UWI-W-11-02
Name: Barry C. Hanson
Address: 11500 W Rader Dr
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83713
Daytime Telephone: 208/384-6387
Contact E-Mail: barryandkeri~msn.com
Name of Utility Company : United Water Idaho
Acknowledge: acknowledge
Please describe your comment briefly:
Dear Sir,
I believe a 19.9% rate increase borders on the obscene. One primary reason for this increase
is reduced usage. Penalizing the public for behavior that is environmentally positive is the
wrong message. Also, a request of this size is completely out of proportion with the current
economics of the Boise Valley. United Water needs to do belt tightening just like the rest
of us.
Sincerely,
Barry Hanson
The form submitted on http://www . puc. idaho. gov /forms/ipuc1/ipuc. html
IP address is 184.99.108.243
i
Jean Jewell
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
boomerangdesigns~yahoo. com
Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:36 PM
Jean Jewell; Beverly Barker; Gene Fadness
PUC Comment Form
A Comment from Stacy Bluma follows:
- - - ---- --- - ----- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - --
Case Number: UWI-W-11-82
Name: Stacy Bluma
Address: 166 Willoway
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83705
Daytime Telephone:
Contact E-Mail: boomerangdesigns~yahoo.com Name of Utility Company: United Water Idaho
Acknowledge: acknowledge
Please describe your comment briefly:
My husband and I are employed full time. However, our income has decreased by approximately
20% since 2088. We disagree strongly with United Water iS 28% rate increase . Utilities in
Boise have increased each year (sewer, trash, water, electricity, gas...) We cannot keep up.
We practice conservation in our home out of necessity. As rates continue to rise and our
income continues to decline, we will need to make some decisions as to what services we can
get rid of. We feel that we are forced to use these utili ties and that there is no
competition to bring down prices. Perhaps United Power shouldn i t have . invested i more than
$20 million in its system without determining whether their customers could afford this.
The form submitted on http://www . puc. idaho. gov /forms/ipuc1/ipuc. html
IP address is 24.117.147.164
- ---------- - - - - ---- - - - ---- - - - - - - - - --
i