Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20110817Comments.pdfIn response to United Water Idaho seeks 19.9% rate hi~/ Thurs. August 4, 2011.IS h4;/ïn 3: 42 For years we have been told to conserve water. We water at night, tae shorter showers, run our dish washer less. Now because, we use less and have more water, the consumer is to be punished by United Water, by asking us for a 20% rate hike. One mile away, Capitol Water has a set fee payment for residents. Although Nampa Irrgation ditch runs though our area it cannot be used for fear of receiving large fines. Many of us are on a fixed income and our water bill seriously depleats that each month. We ask that the Utility Commission not only decline United Waters request, but seriously looks into fixed rates for all Boise Valley Water users. 7 ~ ?/¡j' t!!t €5 T?c òa 0 IJ I? ~ ö:ilJ ~tVli:d de,~?~ýr::~87lò ~ .1'Ì'/l) ~~ oh ~t?O/6~l&.~YO/5 &u~ CJ) C ~rJc. A uJ f:v- ) '-'~ ~~ &ì 78'1 ù C'~~(JÒ6 \() I(\~/ ¡(~ tL '~Íd~ l1cftfJl;Ø' 'l)gI) 'r ~kll/.rN..s " p IFlj ë. 2, ~~~'~i~_.'l"I'"'~" Jean Jewell From: Sent: To: Subject: s. weissone(§yahoo.com Monday, August 15, 2011 10:36 AM Jean Jewell; Beverly Barker; Gene Fadness PUC Comment Form A Comment from Steve Weiss follows: - - - ---- --- - -- ---- - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- Case Number: UWI-W-11-92 Name: Steve Weiss Address: City: Boise State: ID Zip: Daytime Telephone: Contact E-Mail: s.weissone~yahoo.com Name of Utility Company : United Water Acknowledge: acknowledge Please describe your comment briefly: I want my òpinion to be listed among those which oppose the requested rate increase for United Water. I have read their proposal, and find it to be lacking in credible arguement. The rate of return on investment the company is currently reporting is larger than any other options avialble to share holders in this economy. United Water should be happy with their nearly 6% return on investment. Banks are not getting that much on mortgage investment, and United Water' s risk is substantially lower. The additional work on line installation along Hill Road is the cost of doing business, and being allowed to use public domain for their water delivery system w/o any charge by the public. If United water would prefer, the City and County could ask for an offset fee to allow United water to continue to keep their supply structure under public property. And if this fee were to be initiated, it should come with a restriction; the fee will not be considered in any rate increases in any form. The amount of monthly expenses that current customers pay is high enough at this time. Elderly, and young families alike, are taxed in some cases beyond their ability to pay. So, the usage of water is reduced, yards are allowed to dry-up, fruit trees are allowed to die, and then the families are penalized for reducing their water consumption. This is the most rediculous statement in the United Water proposal for rate increase. If the Idaho Public Utilities Commission should decide to allow this rate increase to go through, or even a smaller veriation, I believe serious questions will arise regarding just who i s interest the Commission is charged to protect. I understand that Utili ties are in business to make money, but as I said above, they should be happy with the rate of return on investment in this economy, and any additional amount would be considered . gouging' and therefore not allowed to proceed. I would like to thank the Commission for allowing the customers of United Water this opportuni ty to respond to the requested rate increase. Steve M. Weiss The form submitted on http://www . puc. idaho. gov /forms/ipuc1/ipuc. html IP address is 164.165.237.19 - --- - - --- --- --- - - - --- - - -- - - -- - - - - --- 1 Jean Jewell From: Sent: To: Subject: rubysmith2008(§gmail Tuesday, August 16, 2011 8:59 AM Jean Jewell; Beverly Barker; Gene Fadness PUC Comment Form A Comment from Ruby Smith follows: - - - ----- --- - - - - - -- - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- Case Number: UWI-W-11-92 Name: Ruby Smith Address: City: Boise State: Idaho Zip: 83799 Daytime Telephone: Contact E-Mail: rubysmi th2998~gmail Name of Utility Company: United Water Idaho Acknowledge: acknowledge Please describe your comment briefly: I am against any rate increase for United Water Idaho. I feel the older subdivisions for many years have been subsidizing the so called infrastructure improvements and other reasons given for these rate increases. I live in an older subdivision, and do not have access to the pressurized irrigation due to the ignorance of the developer and would have gladly paid for the irrigation to have been extended to our subdivision as it available to houses just a short distance away and they let the water just run down the gutter---which makes me sick. I also, have tried to gain access to this water without any results. In the media, they stated part of the increase was due to less water being used - - well many of the newer subdivisions have pressurized irrigation. I think United Water Idaho is a big monopoly bully and know they have a lot of us over a barrel. The form submitted on http://www . puc. idaho. gov Iforms/ipuc1/ipuc. html IP address is 184.99.89.178 - --- - - --- --- - - - - - --- - --- - - - -- - - -- --- 1 ~&.(. ~~v£\ (¿,':to Jean Jewell From: Sent: To: Subject: jttaylor2007 (§hotmail.com Wednesday, August 17, 2011 9:39 AM Jean Jewell; Beverly Barker; Gene Fadness PUC Comment Form A Comment from John Taylor follows: -- - - -- - -- ---- --- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - --- - -- Case Number: Name: John Taylor Address. : City: Boise State: ID Zip: Daytime Telephone: Contact E-Mail: jttaylor2997~hotmail. com Name of Utility Company : United Water Acknowledge: acknowledge Please describe your comment briefly: Where in the process is the United Water rate increase? It was not that many years ago that they were granted an increase. Do you ever tell them no and if so when? The only way to get them to manage the company better, as we have had to do in our lives, is to tell them no, not this time. Will you please respond to my questions? Thank You John Taylor The form submitted on http://www . puc. idaho. gov /forms/ipuc1/ipuc. html IP address is 75.94.16.69 - - --------- - - - - --- - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- 1