20071015Comments.pdf

Jean Jewell
Jtfpn Iv (
Vfo A,/10~'
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
vandal1 ~cableone.net
Sunday, October 14, 20072:25 PM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Steven Meade follows:
---- --- - - - - - -- --- - - - - - - - -- - -- - - -----
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Steven MeadeAddress: 3227 Edson Street
City: Boise
State: Idaho
Zip: 83705
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail: vandal1~cableone. net
Name of Utili ty Compa United Water
Add to Mailing List:
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
I received the letter from United Water about its rate increase. Thank you for allowing
me to comment on its request. I would like to assure you that I am doing just fine
budgeting my limited funds to pay my water bill. To date, I have never missed or made a
payment late. In adition, it is actually cheaper for us to pay a bi-monthly bill, then it
is to send in a check every month. Please consider the math: 12 checks and stamps verus 6
checks and stamps. (I cannot believe United Water even listed this as a benfi t. LOL!)
With regard to enhanced water conversation through the provision of more timely
information on consumption... please rest assured that for some time I have been well aware
of the huge rate hike that takes place in the spring. I use my allotment of irrigation
water very effectively in order to keep my fresh water comsumption at a minimum. We have
actually added spigots to the irrigation system so that we can use that water to water
house plants, wash car, wash off the driveway etc... In other words, I highly value our
fresh water resources and do not missue use this precious resource. I can honestly say
that I have read the crap that they include in the mail and do not find it to be useful.
I will also let you know that I don t throw it away. Instead, I recycle the paper.
Regarding the last benefit, I subcribe to United Water s leak guard program, so I am notto worried about either problem. (However, you would never know that I belong to the
program because United Water is constantly sending us requests to sign up for the leak
guard program and its plumbing protection program.In fact, I received another request
to sign up for the leak guard program in addition to the most recent United Water bill. It
is obvious that the left hand doesn t know what the right hand is doing in this operation.
If United Water did, United Water could conserve money by not sending us all this mail to
sign up for services we already subscribe to and wouldn t have to be asking us for more
money. In other words, possibly if United Water valued its resources as much as myself and
my family, they could conserve funds and make this switch at no additional cost to
consumers.
My biggest problem with this request is that they aren t telling us or you that the cost
to provide services is going up therefore, we need a rate increase. Instead UnitedWaters argument is we want to do this for your benefit! In fact, it is quite the
opposi te: it will trigger a rate increase becuase this program will drive the cost up
because now the meter reader will be out every month and the processing center will beworking more. So there is no real benefit.. .just added cost to the consumer: $13.80, plus
the cost of an extra six check, plus the cost of six additional stamps, plus the add time
it takes to write these six extra stamps.
Qui te honestly, I don t see the added benefit!applcation.In closing, please DENY this de minimus
Sincerely,
Steven Meade
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 24.119.187.138
- --- -- --- - ----- --- - ------ -- -- - -- - ---
/~
:f;OliS/a'l
Jean Jewell
;/1:
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
mlreed~mstar2.net
Saturday, October 13, 2007 11 :03 AM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Lorraine Reed follows:
-- - -------- ---- --- ------ - ------ - - - --
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Lorraine Reed
Address: 12627 W. Orion Greens St.
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83709
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail: mlreed~mstar2. net
Name of Utility Company: United Water
Add to Mailing List: no
.,,-
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
I don t see any need for United Water to change to a monthly billing. It will just cost
me more money as we will have to pay for increased costs of meter reading and mailing
bills. We currently have our United Water bill come one month and our Boise Sewer bill
come the next month, so their argument for easier budgeting by changing theirs to a
monthly billing isn t valid for me.
The form submited on http: / /www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 216.126.208.
-- - - ------ ----- - - -- --- - - -- - - - --- ----
/~6((j1
Jean Jewell
ullo lA-v.
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
westont~gmail.com
Saturday, October 13, 2007 12:50 AM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Weston Trexler follows:
-- -- - - -- - - - -- - - -- - ------ - - --- - - - ---
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Weston Trexler
Address: 6401 S Cheshire Ave
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83709
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail: westont~gmail. com
Name of Utility Company: United Water
Add to Mailing List:
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
I received the notice of the application of United
understand how this rate increase makes sense.Water a few days ago,and I cannot
It seems like the only reason for the rate increase is to be able to hire more people to
check meters more often and send out bills every month instead of bimonthly.
Why should I pay an extra $13.83 a year to receive more bills? How is this supposed to
improve the service? Their #1 reason is 'easier budgeting and easier to pay than a
bimonthly bill.
I don t think I know anyone who considers bimonthly billing 'difficult' and I'm prettysure it's easier to remember to pay 6 times rather than 12 times.
I would recommend instead that United Water doesn t hire more personnel and instead allow
customers to pay through their bank's or credit card's Bill Pay service. I would even be
willing to accept bills by email, and then maybe they could lower my bill by a few cents
from savings from postage and printing.
Thank you for considering my comments.
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 71.221.184.130
-- -- -- - - - - --- - - -------- - - - --- -- - - ---
14::'~/1 &/or
Jean Jewell
,/
1u flY
;/
f,;
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
cisakson~yahoo.com
Thursday, October 11 , 20074:31 PM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Cory Isakson follows:
- - --- ---- - -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - --- - - - - ---
Case Number: UWI-W-07-
Name: Cory Isakson
Address: 2810 W Alderberry Dr
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83709
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail: cisakson~yahoo. com
Name of Utility comp~ United Water
Add to Mailing List:
Please describe your question or comment briefly:I belei ve this filing is not in the best interst of the consumer. It will force all of us
to have to work harder to pay for no more service. We are stuck with United Water since
there are no other options. I request that you deny the application and recommend that
United Water seek for ways to lower the costs to the consumer for a service we cannot live
without rather than increasing the costs. I recently returned from Europe and they
allowed the consumer to read their own meters and only checked it annually. Also they had
automated billing systems. Together those kinds of ideas could save the consumer money.
Please prtect us from Monopolies like United Water that take advantage of us when there isno alternative.
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 71.215.30.175
- - - - - ---- --- --- - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - ---
.I~~loll sla,
Jean Jewell
vlo A-I/v'f;;
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
mrmews2~msn.com
Thursday, October 11 , 2007 1 :44 PM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Merlyn H. Mews follows:
-- - -- - - - -- - -- -- - --- -- - -- - - --- - - -- ---
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Merlyn H. Mews
Address: 2650 N MItchell
City: Boise
State: Id
Zip: 83704
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail: mrmews2~msn. com
Name of Utili ty Compa Uni ted
Add to Mailing List: Water
Please describe your question or comment briefly:I fail to see their logic. It would seem that reading meters bi-monthly would save
manpower and the company labor costs. If they want to increase the rates why don t they
just come out and rais~, them rather than sneak in the back door. Also I'm all accostumed
to budgeting on a bi-monthly basis and I'm quite sure that everyone else is too. After
all we ve been doing it this way ever since they came on the scene. Please register my
vote as being against their proposed billing change and rate increase.
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 71.209.59.203
-- -- -- - - - -- - -- - ---- -- - - - - - - - -- - - - -
,I~IIS(O1
Jean Jewell
vi 1'0 ~l'Wyv\MI-
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
fishearl~otc. isu. edu
Thursday, October 11 , 2007 2: 13 AM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Earl R. Fish follows:
- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - -- - -- - - ---- --
Case Number: UWI-W-07-
Name: Earl R. Fish
Address: 5619 Hallmark Ct
City: Boise
State: Idaho
Zip: 83703
Home Telephone: [phone]Contact E-Mail: fishearl~otc. isu. edu
Name of Utility Company: United Water
Add to Mailing List: no
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
The proposed United Water billing plan change to monthly is absurd! Why should I pay
almost $14.00 more a year with no added benefit. The arguments in support are silly.
am perfectly capable of running a budget, and aren t billing complaints your problem?
don t you SAVE 1.12 million dollars and send a bill out every 3 months?
Why
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 70.59.190.
- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - --
r;/'"
Jean Jewell
/(0 A. tI
l-t
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
lenaghen~cableone. net
Tuesday, October 09, 2007 1 :43 PM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form .
A Comment from Mike Lenaghen follows:
--- --------- ---- -- - -- --- --- - --- - - ---
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Mike LenaghenAddress: 4755 Jewell St
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83706-2220
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail: lenaghen~cableone. net
Name of Utility Company: United WaterAdd to Mailing List:
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
I see no reason for monthly billing, guessing that it will only benefit United Water and
not the consumer. I also dislike the addition of $1.15/mo (a 3.5% increase) in the
Customer Charge. My water usage never exceeds the Customer Charge as it is now. If Iused no water I'd have to United Water $31.87 per month just to drive by and interrogate
my meter electronically.
And the rub really shows up in the $3.00 fee they charge to use their online bill pay,check-by-phone, or credit card by phone payments. Now the customers would have to pay
those fee twice as many times yearly. The same goes for the establishments which charge a
$1.00 fee to collect payments for United Water customers.
Let's get real about what is really going on. Don t raise the price of water which might
effect everyone equally, but just raise the fixed fees which will only affect the average
user and have little or no impact on the business community. Is making Micron, arguably
the largest water user in the area, pay an extra little fee for being billed monthly going
to break the company? I think not. But raising water rates for everyone equally
certainly would cost Micron a bunch of money.
The form submited on http: / /www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 24.116.254.
- --- ------- --- ------- --- - -- --- ------
v' J.'ltA/L
iu/lslcJ7
Jean Jewell
1'. 14.
..
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
waynehengst~msn.com
Tuesday, October 09, 2007 9:39 AM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Wayne Hengst follows:
- - --- --- - - - - -- ------ - -- - --- --- ------
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Wayne HengstAddress: 12133 Keates Drive
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 73709-7727
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail: waynehengst~msn. com
Name of Utility Comp~~United WaterAdd to Mailing List:
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
I am against changing to monthly billing fqr United Water. I
the way it is, and I am certainly against a rate increase for
have no problem with billing
no good reason.
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 71.221.171.186
---- ---- - ---- - ----------- --- - --- ---
j~ ~JI;;lo'7
Jean Jewell
tllo
..... H
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Monday, October 15, 20076:24 AM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Shirley Audens follows:
-- -- - - - - - - -- --- -- - - - - -- -- - --- -- - - ---
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Shirley Audens
Address: 12367 W. Dalrymple Street
City: Boise
State: Idaho
Zip: 83709
Home Telephone: [phone]Contact E-Mail:
Name of Utility Company: United Water Idaho
Add to Mailing List: no
Please describe your question or comment 'brrefly:
I don t feel the customers of United Water :should be charged to receive their bill.
Idaho Power, Intermountain Gas, ATT, and Qwest offer online viewing of customer bills. If
the customer wishes to receive the bill via computer, all they have to do is print it out,
thus reducing the cost of mailing to the utility. While United Water is offeringal ternati ve methods of paying the water bill, why aren t they looking for ways to reduce
the cost of mailing bills to their customers. Letting customers choose to have online
viewing and printing of their bill, would provide sufficient savings to United Water to
offset the cost of mailing to customers who choose not to go online.
Sincerely,
Shirley Audens
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 207.225.39.168
---- ------ ---- --- - --- - - - - - --- - ------
j~ ~O/(SIOl
Jean Jewell
/10 14 .1//1"v
"'
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Tuesday, October 09 200710:39 AM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Evelyn follows:
--- -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - ---- - - -- - -- -- - --
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Evelyn
Address: 2162 N. SevenOaks Way
City: Eagle
State: idaho
Zip: 83616
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail:
Name of Utility Compa United Water
Add to Mailing List:
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
How many??? How many persons are requesting monthly billing? I strongly believe if they
knew that their bills would increase because of the change they d deal with the bi-monthly
budgeting requirement. How many requests justify making this milion dollar change, hmmm...
I find it ridiculous that we would make this move costing $1.12 million dollars to
implement so that folks could better budget, NO Way! Leave it alone. We just received a
$4.00 increase from the sewer district, Idaho Power is making an increase and the silly
City of Eagle councilmen are trying to buy their own water company, stop this silliness
and excuse for squeezing more out of the taxpayers, its enough already!
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 71.33.14.
----------- -- -------- - -- -- ----- ---
A-Jc:/0!lqO1
Jean Jewell
/~ /1- II
(--f
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
None
Wednesday, October 10 200712:50 PM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Kory Heyrend follows:
-- - -- ---- - -- - - -- ------ - - - -- - - -- - ----
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Kory Heyrend
Address: 10857 Susan
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83713
Home Telephone: None
Contact E-Mail: None
Name of Utility Compa ~United
Add to Mailing List:
Water
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
Please do not let United Water increase our bills, because they want to bill monthly.
Their reasons for wanting to do this are totally stupid and it will benefit them and
nobody else.
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 24.116.19.
- - -- ---- - -- - - --- - - - ---- - - --- - -- - ---
~-
~II)J()/J#"
Jean Jewell
/10- 11,
(/'
vfo
~. I~
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
None
Wednesday, October 10 200712:30 PM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Guy Blom follows:
- - - - - - -- - - - -- --- - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - --
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Guy Blom
Address: 11319 Pattie Ct.
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83713
Home Telephone: None
Contact E-Mail: None
Name of Utility comp~ United WaterAdd to Mailing List:
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
I own the above property and I am gone 9 months of the year as a firefighter for the U. S.
Forest Service. I always have the water bill in a roommate s name or my ex-wife, because
it is difficult for me to pay some of the utility bills on time. This would just make it
worse for whoever is taking care of this for me. Not only would the water bill increase,
but you have to take the time to write another check and spend money on another stamp.
Not everyone has the internet to payor wants to set up automatic payments (which
sometimes cost too) to pay a bill you haven t seen. And with all the identity theft these
days, I don t want anyone to have the authority for automatic withdrawals. I got a letter
from Bank of America a few months ago and some employee of someone else they hired to take
care of some of their paperwork, stole a lot of people s information. I don t trust anyof these outfits anymore. I also don t see why the customer should pay more for a service
that is clearly FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE WATER COMPANY! ! ! ! .
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 24.116.19.
-- ----------------- - - ---- - - - - - - - - ---
I~ ~/r;1()~
Jean Jewell
11d Ai,/1~
,"
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
None
Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:21 PM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Scott & Mary Kelly follows:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - -- - --- ---
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Scott & Mary Kelly
Address: 8449 Amherst
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83704
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail: None
Name of Utility Company: United WaterAdd to Mailing List:
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
We are elderly and lower income and we have learned to budget with billing every othermonth. The change to. monthly billing appears to be only for the benefit of the watercompany. Monthly billing will cost us more money on the water bill, another 6 stamps a
year, plus we will have to write another 6 checks a year. The total for this might not
seem like much to you, but it certainly does to folks like us. Please don t let them make
this change. Every time we turn around, something is just a 'little bit' more. Well all
these little bit mores just keep adding up. This seem to me to be a change that is notneeded. Them saying it will help their customers is ridiculous.
Please do not allow them to do this to us - we pay enough as it is!!
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 24.116.19.
- - - - - - ------ -- -------- - -- -- - - -- - ----
~I';j"
Jean Jewell
/~
A ./1,;
/-J
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Wednesday, October 10, 200712:09 PM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC Comment/Inquiry Form
A Comment from Delores Walker Kelly follows:
---- - - -- - - - - -- --- - - - - - - - -- - - - -------
Case Number: UWI-W-07-Q4
Name: Delores Walker Kelly
Address: 3211 Camrose Ln.
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83706
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail:
Name of Utility Compa United
Add to Mailing List:
Water
Please describe your 'question or comment briefly:
The water bills have been sent every other month for years and I
change to monthly billing appears to be solely for the benefit of
do not see why WE SHOULD PAY FOR IT. Their excuses that it would
are unbelievably lame.
am used to it. The
the water company and I
help their customers,
Please do not allow them to do this to us - we pay enough as it is!!
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 24.116.19.
---- - - ----- - --- ---- - ---- ----- - - - ----
t5f(J1
Jean Jewell
uI~/J)/v't
(-t
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Friday, October 05, 2007 4:29 AM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Russell Hopkins follows:
- - - - - -- - - - -- ---- - - ------- - - --- --- - --
Case Number: UWI-W-0704
Name: Russell Hopkins
Address: 9076 Donnybrook Crt
City: Boise
State: ID
Zip: 83709
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail:
Name of utility Comp~Idaho
Add to Mailing List:
Public Utilities
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
United Water wants to go from bimonthly to monthly billings. I disagree. There is no
reason to change. The reasons of making it easier to budget, reduce bill complaints, etc.
is ridiculous.
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 24.117.146.
---- - -- --- -- - -- - - --- - - - - - - --- - --- ---
ioll~/b'1
Jean Jewell
i/1o Ai.~10
;- H
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Tuesday, October 09, 2007 2:55 PM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUG CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Barbara Davis follows:
--- - ----- --- - ------ - -- - - - --- - - ---- --
Case Number: uwi-w-07-04
Name: Barbara Davis
Address: 8070 S. SLide Creek Lane
City: Meridian
State: Idaho
Zip: 83642
Home Telephone: [phone]Contact E-Mail:
Name of Utili ty Compa Uni ted Water Idaho
Add to Mailing List:
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
Stick with billing every 2 months, , If people want
then they can average thier own bills and send money
cost for more frequent bills.
to pay more often due to their budget
monthly - I don t want to have higher
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 71.221.180.
- -- --- -- -- ----- --- --- ---- ----- - - - ---
~~,141'flo1
Jean Jewell
,/i If. II,/1iJ
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Tuesday, October 09 20072:57 PM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from FRANK DAVIS follows:
- - ----- - -- -------- - -------- - - --- ----
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: FRANK DAVIS
Address: 8070 S. SLide Creek Lane
City: Meridian
State: Idaho
Zip: 83642
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail:
Name of Utility Comp~ United Water IdahoAdd to Mailing List:
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
Stick with billing every 2 months, , If people want
budget then they can average thier own bills and send
higher cost for more frequent bills.
to pay more often due to their
money monthly - I don t want to have
The form submited on http://www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.htmlIP address is 71.221.180.
---------- - --- ------- - ----- ----- - - --
I ft:'
;!fi
II
Jean Jewell
/10 AI!/10~'
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Friday, October 12, 20079:04 AM
Tonya Clark; Jean Jewell; Gene Fadness; Ed Howell
PUC CommenUlnquiry Form
A Comment from Amy Dahl follows:
- - - --- --- - -- - -- ---- ---- - -- - - --- - - -
Case Number: UWI-W-07-04
Name: Amy DahlAddress: 4765 S. Whitmore Way
City: Boise
State: Idaho
Zip: 83709
Home Telephone: [phone]
Contact E-Mail:
Name of Utility Comp~United
Add to Mailing List:
Water
Please describe your question or comment briefly:
I am against the proposed rate increase by United Water. I am against monthly billing
and monthly meter reading. The current system of billing every two months works fine.
Most people do not need to rely on United Water to advise them to reduce their water usageand conserve during the summer months. Common sense already tells us this. Buying new
vehicles and using more gas, oil etc. for operating these vehicles to check meters monthly
is a huge waste and not necessary.
The form submited on http: / /www.puc.idaho.gov/forms/ipucl/ipuc.html
IP address is 66.233.244.100
- - -- ---- --- - ----- - - - - -- - - - --- - -- ---
.!
~"1"1 /10 A.//f; ;.
Rf"-CE\'/;"
SENT VIA REGULAR MAIL
- -- -
ZUBl OCTlZ p'I"f8: \ 9
October 11, 2007
, . .-. ,..
p I
\OJl,~1U I . ,)" ',I e'.
UTIUYltS COMMISS\Ori
Ms. Jean Jewell, Secretary
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720
Boise, Idaho 83720-0074
Subject: Comments on United Water Idaho s application dated September 17, 2007;
Case No. UWI-W-07-04.
Dear Ms. Jewell:
United Water Idaho ("UW') and the Roche household have enjoyed a cordial
relationship for a number of years. UW provides good service and we promptly pay bills
and monitor consumption. At the same time, this case for a rate increase prompts a
number of questions and concerns.
Costbenefi1:sappem::",,_~ak. UWproposes to spend $49,000 in one-time fundsi -
which will become the subject of afuture rate filing - and to increase annual operating
expense by a net $1 12S,90S . The only concrete benefits listed are an ongoing reduction
of $S,ooo in bad debt expense and $67,633 in working capital. How does this small
return juStify such a large commitment of funds?
Tangible outcomes are unclear. UWs testimony identifies four principle benefitsili
as follows:
Easier customer budgeting and payment - Is "easier" really worth an additional
$13.83 a year to each billed customer? If it is, how do we know this?
Enhanced water conservation - What is the anticipated overall reduction in
consumption, and to what degree does this defer capital investment to meet future
water demands?
Reduction of "high-bill" complaints - How many complaints are received today, and
how many fewer are anticipated in the future? Can current staff then be redeployed
to offset the need for new customer service representatives?
Quicker detection and remediation of problems How frequently do leaks or meter
problems occur at customer premises? How much water will be saved and how much
damage will be avoided using monthly rather than bimonthly inspections?
, '
i September 17; 2007 Direct Testimony of Mr. Wyatt ("Testiniony ), page 7, lines 1-1.
ii Testimony, Exhibit No., line 2.
iii September 17, 2007 Application and Request for Modified Procedure ("Application ), page 2.
- Comments on UWI-W-O7-04 continued-
The funding model may not be sustainable. UW believes that residential
customers can "very likely" offset the proposed increase by reducing their consumptioniv
If achieved, UW's annual revenues for usage will decrease by about $989,981v, yet the
need to support the proposed increase in operating expense remains. Should it be
inferred that UW will apply for another rate increase to recover this loss of revenue?
another increase is not needed, is there a means of funding this conversion from existing
revenues?
Resource requests should be placed in context. Funding is sought for
4 additional meter readers and 4 additional customer service representatives . How
many readers and representatives are on the payroll today? Is the staffing increase
proportionate to the anticipated work load? Is hiring 8 new employees more cost-
effective than hiring fewer employees and incurring overtime or hiring no-one and
outsourcing?
This is presumably the most effective method of addressing service and
conservation issues. What other alternatives were explored? Why does this
application represent the best value to customers? To what degree can a bimonthly
level-payment-plan address budgeting and payment issues? How does this application
augment existing initiatives, such as the UW Cares assistance program?
Given what is known today, I am inclined to favor the existing bimonthly billing system
and avoid a rate increase. While today s system provides less frequent pricing signals, it
still affords the freedom to make informed adjusbnents to consumption. Of course, I will
continue to keep an open mind as this case unfolds.
I also want to thank the Idaho Public Utilities Commission for this opportunity
comment. Please contact me at [phone] or joseph roche(iiJearthlink.net if I can
be of further service.
Sincerely,
Joe Roche, Citizen
2098 N. Mitchell Street
Boise ID 83704
iv Testimony, page 5, lines 12-20.
v 72 649 residential customers (Testimony, Exhibit No., line 12 minus line 11) times 9 CCF /year
times $1.5141/CCF (Testimony, page 5, lines 16-18).
vi Testimony, Exhibit NO., lines 4-
v;
.. J' lol/?jOl //1
.\;
.on-' u/61~t,;P 7
tinvf
J(/
tlut:
ttI
-fA tI/~
ru~
IH-~J
1; 1Jf~
t()~ B$
!/tit
/l-t
- ,
The Simpson Family
10265 W Petearana 8t
Boise 10 83704-1240
/~~
c-1rr1 ~tIMarIan Powers
~.
lolt~,Go
. "
5979 Anna St
/$
Wwv.""~~/)Boise, ID 83709-1077 'j Vi
(jJ~i2-
0k:
~~'
fz-
If 1I)j/
'y'-
W 07-
/fz~
~,-
r- 0
CI)
;;;",.
Q(.n
--
.....A:E
~,"; ~
(:a~
a..W N ,..,
......., '-""
:r. uJt; ~-a::: C) CI t:r- -
::::!
Or mail comments to:
Idaho Public Utilities Commission
O. Box 83720Boise, 10 ~
~Vl'\I'jvJJ-
~t\\\1 \)t\ ~., 1)
, '
Slncere~ __A'-f:.t..""
' '
t:'~~(,\urpV'
.. ,
\ril\\\'" "'Of'United
VXYti\~
\J
06010012007
Loue VY\d VI!~
J kAAX"- w~
~ ~
~~;I_.""""'-\"'/V
- ,,
2905 Grover St.
Boise ID 83705-1623-