20051027Comment.pdf

f~ 'b11()~
Jean Jewell
I fa ~J./1d
~0"-0
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ed Howell
Tuesday, October 2005 11 :23
Jean Jewell; Ed Howell; Gene Fadness; Tonya Clark
Com ment acknowledgement
WWW Form Submission:
Tuesday, October 25, 2005
1 0 : 2 3 : 2 7
Case: Covenant Hill Subdivision - €AG -~ -6~-O3/ U.J.A..J:L-tJ-O~-tJ3
Name: William Goodnight
Street Address: 1014 E. Franklin St.
City: Boise
State: 10
ZIP: 83712
Home Telephone: [phone]E-Mail: idaholc~aol. com
Company: United Wate
~~~-
mailing list yes no:
Comment description: Re: Covenant Hill Subdivision
Not only no, but HELL NO!
It is not the role of the Public Utili ties Commission to accommodate growth. Whenever avalley utility requests a rate increase, a maj or portion of their requests centers on
costs of expanding capacity or extension of services. These costs are regularly passed on
to existing rate payers.
If Covenant Hill cannot get sufficient water from Eagle Water then let them develop their
own system at the expense of the developers. If their aquifer will not support a system,or tapping it would impair Eagle Water, then I guess the area should not be developed.
I do not want to see a rate adj ustment request from United Water in the future that
includes costs associated with increased capacity or extension of services. JUST SAY NO! !
Transaction 10: 10252223.Referred by: http: I Iwww. puc. state. ide usl scripts/polyform. dIll ipuc
User Address: 207.200.116.196User Hostname: 207.200.116.196