Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061106_1731.pdfDECISION MEMORANDUM TO:CO MMISSI 0 NER KJELLAND ER COMMISSIONER SMITH CO MMISSI 0 NER HANSEN COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF LEGAL FROM:SCOTT WOODBURY DATE:NOVEMBER 2, 2006 SUBJECT:CASE NO. IPC-06-26 (Idaho Power) FIRM ENERGY SALES AGREEMENT - MAGIC WIND PARK LLC . On October 27, 2006, Idaho Power Company (Idaho Power; Company) filed an Application with the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (Commission) requesting approval of a 20-year Firm Energy Sales Agreement between Idaho Power and Magic Wind Park LLC (Magic Wind) dated October 11 , 2006 (Agreement). Background On August 4 , 2005, the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (Commission) in Case No. IPC-05-, Order No. 29839, reduced the eligibility cap for avoided cost published rates for non-firm wind projects from 10 aMW to 100 kW, required individual negotiation for larger wind qualifying facilities (QFs), and established criteria for assessing QF contract entitlement. Reference Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURP A). By Commission Order No. 29872 the date for grandfathering eligibility was changed from July 1 , 2004, the Notice of Petition date, to August 4 2005 , the date oflnterlocutory Order No. 29839. On October 20, 2005 , Magic Wind in Case No. IPC-05-34 filed a Motion to Determine Exemption Status seeking a Commission determination that Magic Wind was exempt from the rate eligibility cap established in Commission Order No. 29839. On August 15 , 2006 the Commission in Order No. 30109 determined that Magic Wind was entitled to an exemption. The Commission further declared that Magic Wind was not entitled to receive from Idaho Power a PURP A QF Purchase Power Agreement that established fixed prices for surplus energy outside DECISION MEMORANDUM the 90/110 performance band using the "Modified PacifiCorp Method.Reference Order No. 30000, Case No. PAC-05- Agreement The Magic Wind facility will be located in Sections 1 , 2 and 11 , Township 9 S Range 13 E, Boise Meridian, Twin Falls County, Idaho. Magic Wind warrants that the facility will be a qualified small power production facility (QF) under the applicable provisions of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURP A). The facility will consist of eight clipper wind turbines with individual nameplate ratings of 2.5 MW for each unit. The nameplate capacity of the facility will be 20 MW. The Agreement contains the non-levelized, published avoided cost rates set forth in Order No. 29391. Under normal and/or average operating conditions, Magic Wind will not generate more than 10 aMW on a monthly basis. Energy delivered in excess of this monthly amount is Inadvertent Energy. Idaho Power will accept Inadvertent Energy that does not exceed the Maximum Capacity Amount (20 MW) but will not purchase or pay for Inadvertent Energy. Agreement ~ 7. As reflected in the Application, following issuance of Commission exemption Order No. 30109, Magic Wind inquired ofldaho Power as to whether it would be possible to utilize the methodology for computing shortfall energy payments the Commission approved in the Firm Energy Sales Agreement between Idaho Power and Fossil Gulch Wind Park LLC (Case No. IPC- 04-, Order No. 29630) rather than the methodology for determining shortfall energy payments established by Commission Order No. 29632 in Case No. IPC-04-, the U. Geothermal case. Under the Fossil Gulch Method if the QF delivers less than 90% of the scheduled "net energy" amount (for reasons other than forced outage or force majeure events) the shortfall energy is priced at 85% of the market price, less the contract rate, the difference capped at 150% of contract rate. In the u.s. Geothermal case the Commission expressed a concern that under certain conditions use of the Fossil Gulch methodology could have adverse results for QFs. (Order No. 29632, p. 20.) Magic Wind has voluntarily selected the Fossil Gulch method. Agreement ~~ 7.5. Use of the Fossil Gulch methodology is a negotiated term of the Agreement and is mutually acceptable to Idaho Power and Magic Wind. As reflected in the Application and Appendix B to the Agreement, Magic Wind is one of the generating resources that may be affected by the outcome of the Cassia Wind complaint, Case No. IPC-06-, a dispute regarding cost responsibility for funding upgrades to DECISION MEMORANDUM Idaho Power s transmission system. Magic Wind has selected July 31 , 2007 as the Scheduled First Energy Date and December 31 , 2007 as the Scheduled Operation Date for the facility. These dates are subject to revision. Section 24 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement will not become effective until the Commission has approved all of the Agreement's terms and conditions and declared that all payments Idaho Power makes to Magic Wind for purchases of energy will be allowed as prudently incurred expenses for ratemaking purposes. COMMISSION DECISION Staff recommends that the Application in Case No. IPC-06-26 be processed pursuant to Modified Procedure, i., by written submission rather than by hearing. Reference IDAP A 31.01.01.201-204. Does the Commission agree that Modified Procedure is appropriate? Scott Woodbury bls/M:IPC-O6-26 sw DECISION MEMORANDUM