Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20190517 Decision Memo.pdft DECISION MEMORANDUM TO COMMISSIONER KIELLANDER COMMISSIONER RAPER COMMISSIONER ANDERSON COMMISSION SECRETARY COMMISSION STAFF LEGAL FROM:MATT HUNTER DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE: M.ay 9,2019 SUBJECT:PETITION OF SUEZ WATER IDAHO INC. FOR EXEMPTION TO UTILITY CUSTOMER RELATIONS RULES 311.04 AND .05, APPROVAL oF WAMR OF PAYMENT PROCESSING FEES, AND REMOVAL OF FIELD COLLECTION TRIP CHARGE FROM TARIFF, CASE NO. SUZ. w-19-01 On April I'1,2019, SUEZ Water Idaho Inc. ("SUEZ") filed a Petition with the Commission. After consulting with Staff, SUEZ filed an Amended Petition on May 6,2019 to clarify the scope of SUEZ's requests. The Amended Petition makes four requests for relief. First, SUEZ petitions the Commission for an Order exempting them from Utility Customer Relations Rules 311.04 and.05l,31.21.01.311.04 and.05. In summary, these rules require a utility employee to try to make face-to-face contact immediately before terminating the customer's service for non-payment to: (l) give the customer a final chance to avoid termination of service by paying the bill at that time (see UCRR 31 1.04); or (2) if the customer does not pay at that time, notify the customer about how the customer can have service reconnected. SUEZ explains that it wants the option of discontinuing payment at the door practices, and of notifying customers in ways besides providing mandatory on-site personal or paper notice. SUEZ seeks the exemption so it can use advances in metering, communication, and electronic payment technologies to reduce operating costs and increase the safety of utility employees without sacrificing customer service. 1DECISION MEMORANDUM I Second, SUEZ petitions that the exemption not become effective sooner than four months after the Commission issues its Order granting the exemption. This will give SUEZ time to notify its customers of the approved changes to its customer notification, payment, and disconnection process prior to the exemption becoming effective. Third, SUEZ petitions the Commission to approve SUEZ's proposal to waive all customer Western Union payment processing fees by paying those convenience fees on behalf of its customers, and including this cost in future general rate cases. SUEZ summarizes its third- party payment processing fees as follows: SUEZ asks that it be authorized to defer the Western Union fees costs until its next rate case and recover the deferred amount over three years. Thereafter, the processing fees would become a normal operating expense. Finally, SUEZ petitions to modify Schedule 5 ("Miscellaneous Fees and Charges") to remove the $15.00 Field Collection Trip Charge. This petition is related to SUEZ's petition to be exempted from UCRR 31.21.01.311.04 and.05. As SUEZ personnel would no longer accept payments of past-due bills from a customer at the time of disconnection of service, the Field Collection Trip Charge would be obsolete. SUEZ requests that the Commission process the case under Modified Procedure. 2 Payment Option Current Charge Proposed Charge (if Petition approved) US Bank (downtown Boise - cash)$s.00 $5.00 Call Western Union $ 1.99 No cost SUEZ website (credit card)$ 1.e9 No cost eBill (credit card)$1.99 No cost Western Union Pay Station (cash)$ 1.s0 No cost Western Union Pay Station (check)$ 1.00 No cost US Mail (first class stamp)$0.50 $0.50 US Bank (downtown Boise - check)No cost No cost Victory Road office (checks only)No cost No cost Victory Road night drop (check only)No cost No cost E-pay direct debit (ACH)No cost No cost eBill (ACH)No cost No cost DECISION MEMORANDUM \ STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Commission issue a Notice of Application and Notice of Modified Procedure setting a July 18, 2019 comment deadline, and a July 25, 2019 reply deadline. COMMISSION DECISION Should the Commission issue a Notice of Application and Notice of Modified Procedure setting a July 18, 2019 comment deadline, and a July 25,2019 reply deadline? fo,Matt unter Deputy Attorney General I:\Legal\WATER\SUZ-W- I 9-0 I \SUVW I 90 I -mh.doc JDECISION MEMORANDUM