Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20081215Reply Comments on Reconsideration.pdfJohn R. Hammond, Jr., ISB No. 5470 Fisher Pusch & Alderman LLP U.S. Bank Plaza, 5th Floor 101 S. Capitol Boulevard, Suite 500 Post Office Box 1308 Boise, ID 83701 Telephone: (208) 331-1000 Facsimile: (208) 331-2400 RECE D 2008 DEC 12 PM~: 54 ,'. '."", "è' I,"'IDAHO i"ubt.,v .. Tire: rCl','~H",c;¡(H,;U i III CV ,.- )!fìh'H.::.."vl~ Attorneys for Applicant BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF MAYFIELD SPRIGS WATER COMPAN, INC., FOR A CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY CASE NO. MSW-W-08-0l REPLY COMMENTS ON RECONSIDERATION COMES NOW, Mayfeld Springs Water Company, Inc., an Idaho corporation (the "Company" or "Mayfield"), by and through its counsel, Fisher Pusch & Alderman LLP, and files its Reply Comments on Reconsideration in response to the previously filed comments of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission Staff and Intervenor Gerald J. Corvino. ARGUMENT Mayfield agrees with Staffs analysis that the developer should be allowed to recover the cost of the system through the sale of lots especially where the presumption of contrbuted capital exists. By Mr. Corvino's calculations, only One Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars ($140,000.00) would have been recovered by the developer through hook-up fees when the system actually cost Six Hundred Ninety Thousand Dollars ($690,000.00) to build. REPLY COMMENTS ON RECONSIDERATION - 1-ORIGINAL 1. Retroactive Ratemaking and McGuire Estates The Company still asserts that to order refunds for charges or fees assessed prior to the Application date would amount to retroactive ratemaking. See Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company v. Hall et ai., 453 U.S. 571, 101 S.Ct. 2925, 60 L.Ed.2d 856 (1981) ('''the Commission itself has no power to alter a rate retroactively. When the Commission finds a rate uneasonable, it "shall determine the just and reasonable rate. . . to be thereafter observed and in force." § 5 (a), 52 Stat. 823, 15 U.S.C. § 7l7d (a) (emphasis added). See, e. g., FPC v. Tennessee Gas Co., 371 U.S. 145, 152-153 (1962); FPC v. Sierra Pacifc Power Co., 350 U.S. 348, 353 (1956). This rule bars "the Commission's retroactive substitution of an unreasonably high or low rate with a just and reasonable rate.' City of Piqua v. FERC, supra, at 12,610 F.2d, at 954."). Based on the Commission's analysis in Order No. 30628 of McGuire Estates Water Co. v. Idaho PUC, the Company also asserts that the Commission canot grant the relief Mr. Corvino seeks, that is the refund of charges or fees assessed prior to the Application date in this case. In McGuire Estates the Idaho Supreme Court overturned a Commission Order barng a water company "from collecting past due accounts which accrued while the Company was operating as an 'illegal' utility. . . ." McGuire Estates Water Co., v. Idaho PUC, 111 Idaho 341, 343, 723 P.2d 885,887 (1986). 2. No Privity of Contract In combination with the above arguments, or as an alternative to them, the Company asserts that the vast majority of homeowners do not have privity of contract with the Company in regard to the hookup charges. At least 46 homeowners, including Mr. Corvino, in the Arowrock subdivision contracted with a third pary in regard to the payment of the hookup fee and not Mayfeld or its predecessors, Arowrock Water or Arbor Ridge, LLC. In his comments, REPLY COMMENTS ON RECONSIDERA nON - 2 - Mr. Corvino essentially admits that this was the case for at least 36 homeowners. Privity of contract is required in a contract action to recover economic loss." See Salmon Rivers Sportsman Camps, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 97 Idaho 348, 354, 544 P.2d 306, 312 (1975). Based on the foregoing, the vast majority of relief requested by Mr. Corvino must be denied. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing arguents, Mayfield respectfully requests that the Commission deny the relief requested by Intervenor Gerald J. Corvino in his Petition for Reconsideration and Comments on Reconsideration. DATED THIS -i day of December, 2008. MAYFIELD SPRIGS WATER COMPAN, INC. REPLY COMMENTS ON RECONSIDERATION - 3 - .' , CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, ~~I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this ~ day of December, 2008, a tre and correct copy of the foregoing document was served on the following individuals by the method indicated below: Jean Jewell IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 472 W. Washington St. POBox 83720 Boise ID 83720-5983 ) U.S. Mail ) Facsimile (208) 342-3829 ( ) Overnight Delivery tx Messenger Delivery ( 1 Email Don Howell Krstine A. Sasser Deputy Attorney General IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION PO Box 83720 Boise ID 83720-0074 ( ) U.S. Mail ( ) Facsimile (208) 342-3829 ( ) Overnight Delivery b4 Messenger Delivery ( ) Email Gerald J. Corvino 11865 W. Tustin Lake Kuna ID 83634-5032 pdu.S. Mail ( tFacsimile ( ) Overnght Delivery ( ) Messenger Delivery ( ) Email REPLY COMMENTS ON RECONSIDERA nON - 4 -